Two Americas. Living in the political twilight zone.
- Thread starter aristotle
- Start date
It's unpopular to suggest cutting military--- and I'm a right-winger, so you can imagine-- but, while we're talking "compassion", it's costing us a fortune to run around the world being everybody else's mommy. If we shrunk our military to what is actually needed to defend the United States, the savings would probably be enormous. Besides, being the world's policeman has been a thankless task anyway.
cubansammich
Not a Member
Just the opposite. They took it to the streets. They beat the bushes. ( and I don't mean George & Co.) They disseminated information in a way their targets prefer to receive it. In other words they paid attention to the voters. The Angry White Men were too arrogant to care about such things. The AWM expected to impose their will on the electorate. It is nothing short of amazing to me with Obama being so vulnerable they could not find a way to win. The AWM got what they deserved.
Last edited:
Why do Obama voters insist on injecting race into every discussion? Can you see your own racial bigotry in the quote above? What is truly shameful is how the Democrat Party exploits racial minorities through fear-mongering and false accusations. I understand why the Democrats do this. It is a winning strategy from their point of view. The true cost of winning through stirring racial hatred is greater and greater mistrust. In the long term, it is a disasterous ploy.
I am so tired of the term angry white men. So someone has a different view on running the country they must be called names rather than debated. I see more hate on the far left than i see on the far right personally.
Sent from my Fisher Price ABC123 via EO Forums
Now that I think of it, that is interesting. Hate being labeled, but label everything with derogatory labels. If I used a racially insensitive label I would be told in no uncertain terms how evil I am, but it's OK to label me an "Angry White Male" because I voted Republican. OK, noted. Next----.
cubansammich
Not a Member
Ok, point taken. Remove AWM and replace it with anything else you'd like. The results will be the same.
White males can be called anything. They aren't the protected class regarding political correctness . AWM seems to be the current liberal talking point. Nothing wrong with being a white male or a little angry. Especially when they can see a soft tyranny take hold in this country. Whatever anger there might be didn't result in widespread riots in the street from the last election.
cubansammich
Not a Member
Congratulations on your ability to proficiently parrot Mark Levin.
That is really funny coming from a man who parrots liberal talking points.
I don't listen to much talk radio these days, I have heard enough to know that Mark Levin is a conservative talk show host though.
Would it surprise you to find out that the Republican Party is made up of more than just "Angry White Men"? I suspect it would, since that's all you heard from your teachers. But, the party has the same cross-section of people that you find in the Democratic Party, only more to the Right than the Left politically. It's even got a half-breed (half white man, half American Indian) and I know that for a fact. He looks out at me from my mirror when I shave in the morning.
cubansammich
Not a Member
Well, I am a liberal so there ya go.
Uh, no, it would not. I just like saying it because it makes so many of these guys squirm.
No question. We're just smarter, that's all.
Why Liberals Are More Intelligent Than Conservatives | Psychology Today
Not sure how this is relevant but ok.
A legend in their own minds. That kind of reminds me of the tale of the self-made man who worships his creator. Of course those psych-today folk are going to declare liberals more intelligent, they're liberals after all. In much the same way that Rush Limbaugh declares himself to be brilliant and something like 99 percent right. Yes, I do come across his show now and then.
Tennesseahawk
Veteran Expediter
Well if you say it to make people squirm, then that makes you a TROLL.
I don't think it's that liberals are smarter... but they are definitely know-it-alls.
BTW... I'm going out on a limb to assume that article was written by a liberal.