RLENT
Veteran Expediter
Seems like the Feds have a response to all those poor "innocents" who were just touristing and didn't know any better ...
The Trump Card...
- Thread starter muttly
- Start date
Seems like the Feds have a response to all those poor "innocents" who were just touristing and didn't know any better ...
Sure, JanLOL ... not triggered ... just trying to #understandtheobtusebabbling ...
RLENT
Veteran Expediter
Unfortunate but probably necessary ... given the circumstances.
Really?
How in God's grace can this sicko continue to be defended!
Pay attention to the 2nd video.... He's accusing the Gov of Virginia saying...
"Babies can be killed after birth"
How in God's grace can this sicko continue to be defended!
Pay attention to the 2nd video.... He's accusing the Gov of Virginia saying...
"Babies can be killed after birth"
RLENT
Veteran Expediter
If they were allowed into the building by police, and they didn’t damage property themselves. So what?
Seems like the Feds have a response to all those poor "innocents" who were just touristing and didn't know any better ...
RLENT
Veteran Expediter
They can make that claim ... if they go to trial I guess.
Care to make any bets about how that will go ?
Then they aren't guilty of damaging property.
Well, they are potentially facing charges for whatever else they did do obviously.
There isn’t video of police standing there by the door allowing people to enter?
Then they aren't guilty of damaging property.
Well, they are potentially facing charges for whatever else they did do obviously.
RLENT
Veteran Expediter
If there is, is it your position that the police should have then used force to prevent entry ?
If so, I'm liking that train of thought.
Just what sort of force would be necessary for a few cops to repel a violent mob, consisting of hundreds - if not thousands - of individuals ?
RLENT
Veteran Expediter
Not in and of itself.
It is evidence that they were aware of what was going on (violence committed to gain entry to a restricted area)
For most normal sane people that would be a tip-off that maybe something wasn't entirely copacetic.
For MAGA's not so much apparently.
There are videos where there wasn’t any violence by the protesters at the door before being let in.If there is, is it your position that the police should have then used force to prevent entry ?
If so, I'm liking that train of thought.
Just what sort of force would be necessary for a few cops to repel a violent mob, consisting of hundreds - if not thousands - of individuals ?
Kind of looks like prosecutors want to make that a crime. Knowingly walking past damaged property.Not in and of itself.
It is evidence that they were aware of what was going on (violence committed to gain entry to a restricted area)
For most normal sane people that would be a tip-off that maybe something wasn't entirely copacetic.
For MAGA's not so much apparently.
That's a reasonable question; one now being answered by prosecutors, judges and juries.
No, it does not look like prosecutors want to make that a crime. I don't know of a single prosecutor that has sought to bring that charge, or is advocating a change if law to make it a crime. And I don't know of a single legislator who would think it wise to make it a criminal offense to "knowingly walk past damaged property." Yours is a ridiculous statement and you know it.
Last edited:
Why are prosecutors leaning into then, that a protester knowingly walked past damaged property? For what purpose other to implicate someone with an enhanced charge and sentence recommendation.
Maybe so, but it seems to make them happy in their tidy little world where they get to be right about everything all the time.
Last edited:
The problem is they spew their garbage outside of EO world.