Ohio, privatization of roads, whats in ur wallet

skyraider

Veteran Expediter
US Navy
Ohio will now spend $3.4 million to study turnpike privatization

May 2, 2012 - 1:05:09 PM | By David Tanner, Associate Editor - Land Line

By David Tanner, Land Line associate editor

State transportation officials say studying the possibility of leasing the Ohio Turnpike to private investors is going to cost $550,000 more than originally thought. It’s just the latest in an ongoing series of events related to the controversial turnpike proposal. OOIDA opposes the private lease or sale of infrastructure, calling it a “pawn shop” maneuver that leaves users holding the bag.

Highway users, along with numerous state and federal lawmakers threw a fit last fall when the Ohio Department of Transportation received a $1.5 million grant to study a possible turnpike lease. Gov. John Kasich offered the possibility of a lease as part of his 2011 budget.

In response to the backlash from mostly Democrats including U.S. Rep. Tim Ryan, the feds revoked the funds for a short time only to reinstate them later after congressional Republicans pushed back in favor of the study.

This past February, officials revealed that the study would likely cost $2.85 million. Now, according to the latest reports, the Ohio DOT has added two more firms to the study team and has upped the cost estimate to $3.4 million.

OOIDA opposes the pawn shop mentality of leasing infrastructure to the private sector. The Association points to the Indiana Toll Road lease that leaves highway users including truckers on the hook to guarantee the investors make a profit through the year 2081. According to the Indiana lease, which took effect in 2006, tolls were allowed to increase from about $14 to more than $32 in the first five years of the 75-year agreement.

The Ohio Turnpike increased tolls in January. The agency estimates it will make $249 million in tolls this year. Kasich estimated last year that a turnpike lease could generate $3 billion in up-front cash.

OOIDA says that upfront cash would get used up quickly and the investor would be allowed to pocket the tolls for decades afterward.

Should a lease last 50 years, an investor could potentially reap almost $12.5 billion for its $3 billion investment, assuming revenue stays around $249 million per year – and that’s without toll increases that would certainly be guaranteed. Maintenance costs would come out of that total, but as truckers have reported to Land Line about the condition of the Indiana Toll Road, the private investor in that lease is in no hurry to maintain the roadway the way a state DOT or turnpike agency would.

Land Line Magazine: The Business Magazine for Professional Truckers
 

layoutshooter

Veteran Expediter
Retired Expediter
There does not seem to be a good solution to our problems with the roads out there. It is very clear that government is unable to maintain the roads. There is far too much politics and pocket lining when government runs anything.

Selling parts of the Interstate SHOULD be illegal. We all own a piece of that system. Selling it to non U.S. companies is worse.

Everyone, the people and government alike, must realize that there is just not enough money going on roads and bridges. Even if 100% of the fuel tax dollars were being spent on roads, which it is not, there would not be enough.

Good luck, with today's political climate it is unlikely that the problem will get even close to being solved and roads will continue to go down hill. It is going to take far more deaths before anyone will take any real notice of the problems.
 

xiggi

Veteran Expediter
Owner/Operator
People always turn lease to sell when it comes to roads the word is lease. Leasing the Indiana toll road was one of the best moves my state ever made.

Sent from my SPH-D710 using EO Forums
 

layoutshooter

Veteran Expediter
Retired Expediter
People always turn lease to sell when it comes to roads the word is lease. Leasing the Indiana toll road was one of the best moves my state ever made.

Sent from my SPH-D710 using EO Forums

The minute that a State 'leases' part of the interstate state system to a foreign private group all federal dollars used to support that road should stop. I see no valid reason for my fuel tax dollars to go to subsidize non-U.S. companies. The road was not 100% owned by the State of Indiana. It was not all theirs to lease. Betcha dollars to doughnuts I STILL have to pay 100% of the fuel tax there, for almost zero benefit, and STILL pay the tolls. What a rip off.
 

xiggi

Veteran Expediter
Owner/Operator
The minute that a State 'leases' part of the interstate state system to a foreign private group all federal dollars used to support that road should stop. I see no valid reason for my fuel tax dollars to go to subsidize non-U.S. companies. The road was not 100% owned by the State of Indiana. It was not all theirs to lease. Betcha dollars to doughnuts I STILL have to pay 100% of the fuel tax there, for almost zero benefit, and STILL pay the tolls. What a rip off.

I could agree with that.

Sent from my SPH-D710 using EO Forums
 

Jason2

Veteran Expediter
Owner/Operator
I know what yall mean about roads. Look at how Alabama has done hwy 43 coming in the state.ROUGH is all I can say.

I know they are widening it but the state shouldn't have put down tar and gravel saying that they patched it.
 

dancorn

Veteran Expediter
Just mailed a $50 check to some private outfit in Knoxville for running a red light in Selmer, TN. The idea of some arsehole company using a local government unit to force me to add to their revenue is galling. I would not have been thrilled to pay the fine to the city but at least it would have all gone to them and not been split with the wormy private camera company. GRRRR!!!

Another type of privatization.
 
Top