N.H. committee backs REAL ID ban

OntarioVanMan

Retired Expediter
Owner/Operator
By NORMA LOVE
Associated Press Writer

CONCORD, N.H. (AP) _ The New Hampshire Legislature took a baby step Tuesday toward rejecting what they say amounts to the creation of a national ID card.

The House Transportation Committee voted unanimously to recommend barring the state from complying with the federal REAL ID Act, which sets standards for driver's licenses. The full House next considers the bill.

Rep. Sherman Packard, R-Londonderry, said Congress went too far in passing the law.

''We have to uphold the constitution,'' he said. ''We will not be blackmailed by the federal government.''

Committee Chairman Jim Ryan, a Franklin Democrat, said New Hampshire needs to send a clear statement that ''we believe the federal government has strayed too far.''

Last year, New Hampshire led the way in opposing the law _ a move now being considered by other states.

Earlier this month, President Bush bowed to pressure from the nation's governors and Congress and granted states until Dec. 31, 2009, to comply. Two years ago, Congress set a deadline for states to comply with uniform licensing standards by May 2008.

The law passed in response to the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attacks. It requires all states to bring their driver's licenses under a national standard and to link their record-keeping systems. States must verify identification used to obtain a driver's license, such as birth certificates, Social Security numbers and passports.

Driver's licenses not meeting the standard won't be accepted as identification to board a plane and enter federal buildings.

At a hearing last week, opponents argued the law was too intrusive. They also said the risk was too great that thieves would gain access to information needed to steal people's identities if a national database was created.

In January, Maine lawmakers adopted a nonbinding resolution opposing the law.

Rep. Neal Kurk, R-Weare, the prime sponsor of New Hampshire's bill, says 26 states have either legislation or resolutions in the works opposing REAL ID. He said 11 states have legislation facilitating compliance _ some of which also have measures opposing the act.

Last year, New Hampshire's House voted against participating and Gov. John Lynch said he would sign the bill, but the Senate rejected it. New Hampshire also was one of two states picked to pilot the program, but Lynch and the Executive Council did not approve the $3 million grant.

Last month, Lynch reiterated his concerns that too many questions remained about the cost, privacy and turning motor vehicle workers into de facto agents of Homeland Security. He said implementing the federal identity system could cost New Hampshire tens of millions of dollars.

Lynch reiterated Tuesday he would sign the bill if it reaches his desk.
 

LDB

Veteran Expediter
Retired Expediter
I have no problem with requiring a certified birth certificate to get a driver's license. Nobody should be given the privilege that isn't legally entitled to it. If they're worried about identity theft, make it a capital crime and execute the #####.

Leo Bricker, 73's K5LDB, OOIDA Life Member 677319
Owner, Panther trucks 5508, 5509, 5641
Highway Watch Participant, Truckerbuddy
EO Forum Moderator
----------
Support the entire Constitution, not just the parts you like.
 

greg334

Veteran Expediter
I think that it is time we move to a national driving system, let's just be like europe.

the last paragraph says a lot; "Last month, Lynch reiterated his concerns that too many questions remained about the cost, privacy and turning motor vehicle workers into de facto agents of Homeland Security. He said implementing the federal identity system could cost New Hampshire tens of millions of dollars."

I find this a bunch of BS. to move to a uniformed id system cost, privacy should not be an issue. As for "turning motor vehicle workers into de facto agents of Homeland Security" I strongly feel that it should be part of their job to ensure that the laws are followed.
 

OntarioVanMan

Retired Expediter
Owner/Operator
Man you guys are quick!

My make on this is the FEDS already are requiring passports of anyone crossing the border and that requires a certified BC plus theres that social security card..the feds infacto already know all about you so whats the big deal? And remember they have a copy of your footprint taken at the hospital when you were born.
 

Tennesseahawk

Veteran Expediter
Man, Leo... you're wanting a lot of laws to be capital offenses. Want to stop jay-walking? Make it a capital offense. Running red lights? Kill the scum! Talk about fearing your government!

-Vampire Super Slooth Trucker!!!
 

LDB

Veteran Expediter
Retired Expediter
I wouldn't go so far as jay walking. Felony offenses against or harming another person is a different matter. Nobody accidentally commits felonies.

Leo Bricker, 73's K5LDB, OOIDA Life Member 677319
Owner, Panther trucks 5508, 5509, 5641
Highway Watch Participant, Truckerbuddy
EO Forum Moderator
----------
Support the entire Constitution, not just the parts you like.
 
Top