Generation ME - The Military's New Security Problem

Pilgrim

Veteran Expediter
Retired Expediter
Here's an article that brings out some really good points that go beyond dealing with cyber-terrorists like Julian Assange. Considering their lax security standards and the type of ego-centric recruits with whom they're having to deal such as Bradley Manning and Brian Martin, the military has an entirely new set of problems on its hands that need to be addressed yesterday.

"Martin and Manning may be the victims of current American and European culture and its clashing values with the Military culture. Both young men are firmly considered to be in what researchers call 'Generation Me'...
The reflex of Soldiers of those generations (X and Y), Finch said, is to disdain authority, demand their right to a variety of self-expression modes, tattoos among them, and to expect praise for merely showing up for duty. "They don't just question authority; they flat-out disrespect it entirely," he said. "You really have to earn their respect. It will not come automatically just because of (your) rank or title." Finch characterized this group as stubborn, isolated, unapologetically profane and direct to the point of bluntness. Approval from peer-groups is usually more important than from authority figures, even their families."

Read more: Opinion: What will the United States military do about security risks?
 

greg334

Veteran Expediter
This isn't just a security problem, it is a real problem through the entire system.

I mentioned a while ago about the insubordination of recruits and the special programs to convince them to be nice and take orders. I also mentioned to a lot of horror here on EO that one of the biggest issues surrounding the onset of PTSD in the military is the culture that the soldier grows up in - they are not prepared for the exposure of the mess they face in combat.

So this kind of confirms my position but at the same time is rather sad.
 

chefdennis

Veteran Expediter
While it is certainly a problem, our military as in the "foot soldier" is slowly being cut to minimum levels as barrys admin is now using more "Contractors" then at anytime in history....our foot soldiers will never go totally away, but more and more they are being replaced....
 

greg334

Veteran Expediter
Chef,
Not to argue with your point but it seems sort of misplaced.

Between the issue of retirements being on hold for a few years (not all but many key resources within the military) and the fact that the numbers between last year and this year from the DoD has shown an increase (from 1,422,608 in 10/09 to 1,433,286 10/10). I don't see where the reduction was made as you have stated nor from any information I have found, contracting services have gained numbers outside of support like state side food services and other labor intense services. The use of Private Military Services (security contractors) is play up because of the media but in fact there has been a serious reduction of the use of the services because of the wind-down in Iraq and the problems with legal issues and liabilities.

Those gains by the way come from the Army, gaining ~13,000 active personal during that same time period. The other branches lost members, according to the DoD reports mostly through retirement that was on hold for a long time.
 

Pilgrim

Veteran Expediter
Retired Expediter
Another thing to consider is that the military as a whole is holding its numbers steady in a severe recession where unemployment and under-employment hovers in the mid to high teens. I personally know two families whose college graduate sons have recently enlisted in the Navy and Coast Guard because they couldn't find decent jobs with decent benefits. When the economy finally starts to come back our military recruiters' jobs will be even more difficult than it is now. On the other hand, these little twerps like Manning might be less likely to use the military as a safe haven.

On the other hand, there's this guy Martin who's a totally different animal; he enlisted in the Navy with the apparent intent of becoming a career traitor, intending to sell classified information for the duration of his anticipated 20-year tour of duty. His actions and intentions sure sound like treason to me, and the good thing about this case is that he's subject to the penalties of the UCMJ and military court martial instead of having to depend solely on the Obama/Holder justice dept to handle the prosecution.

Federal agents search Oswego County home after son offered to sell U.S. secrets (Update: Read the search warrant, what they found) | syracuse.com

Still, it's a bit worrisome when we consider that within the last year we've seen Maj. Nadal Hasan, Manning and Martin as examples of soldiers damaging our military from within who should have never been there in the first place. What kind of standards (or lack thereof) are in place that allowed them into our military and how many more of these infiltrators are there that no one knows about?
 

LDB

Veteran Expediter
Retired Expediter
One problem is they aren't taught that you respect everyone until they do something significant enough and legitimate enough to earn your disrespect. There's a subset of my generation who are wrong minded and rather than teaching the next generation to be right and to do right they are teaching them to be bad citizens and bad people. Unless we get more people back to being right we're doomed to see this problem increasing. Too many wrong people breeding and creating more wrong people. We'll be hearing from some soon I'm sure.
 

chefdennis

Veteran Expediter
Well Greg, from the 1st hand info i have gotten from returning "contractors' that were recruited after he let his time in our military and from more then a few articles there is a lot more then "stateside" support and "food services" involved...

This article was from this week.....

America's New Mercenaries

Tim Shorrock
Wed Dec 15, 10:39 pm ET
America's New Mercenaries - Yahoo! News


NEW YORK – As American commanders meet this week for the Afghanistan review, Obama is hiring military contractors at a rate that would make Bush blush. Tim Shorrock on the Blackwater heirs.

Top U.S. commanders are meeting this week to plan for the next phase of the Afghanistan war. In Iraq, meanwhile, gains are tentative and in danger of unraveling.

Both wars have been fought with the help of private military and intelligence contractors. But despite the troubles of Blackwater in particular – charges of corruption and killing of civilians—and continuing controversy over military outsourcing in general, private sector armies are as involved as ever.

Without much notice or debate, the Obama administration has greatly expanded the outsourcing of key parts of the U.S.-led counterinsurgency wars in the Middle East and Africa, and as a result, for its secretive air war and special operations missions around the world, the U.S. has become increasingly reliant on a new breed of specialized companies that are virtually unknown to the American public, yet carry out vital U.S. missions abroad.

Companies such as Blackbird Technologies, Glevum Associates, K2 Solutions, and others have won hundreds of millions of dollars worth of military and intelligence contracts in recent years to provide technology, information on insurgents, Special Forces training, and personnel rescue. They win their work through the large, established prime contractors, but are tasked with missions only companies with specific skills and background in covert and counterinsurgency can accomplish.

Some observers fear that the widespread use of contractors for U.S. counterinsurgency efforts in Afghanistan, Pakistan, and the Horn of Africa could deepen the secrecy surrounding the American presence in those regions, making it harder for Congress to provide proper oversight.

Even in Iraq, where the U.S. has ended combat operations, the government is "greatly expanding" its use of private security companies, creating "an entirely new role for contractors on the battlefield," Michael Thibault, the co-chairman of the federal Commission on Wartime Contracting, recently warned Congress.


Blackbird, which is staffed by former CIA operatives, is a key contractor in a highly classified program that sends secret teams into enemy territory to rescue downed or captured U.S. soldiers.

Among the companies getting contracts is Blackbird, which is staffed by former CIA operatives, and is a key contractor in a highly classified program that sends secret teams into enemy territory to rescue downed or captured U.S. soldiers.

Glevum, meanwhile, fields a small army of analysts in Iraq and Afghanistan who provide the U.S. military with what the company opaquely describes as "information operations and influence activities."

And K2 is a highly sought-after subcontractor and trainer for the most secretive units of the U.S. Army Special Operations Command, including the SEAL team that rescued the crew of the Maersk Alabama from a gang of pirates last year. It is based near the Army's Special Forces headquarters in Fort Bragg, North Carolina, and was founded by Lane Kjellsen, a former Special Forces soldier.

Gen. David Petraeus, the top U.S. commander of conventional and special forces in the war zones, is using contractors because "he wants an organization that reports directly to him," said a former top aide to the commander of the U.S. Special Operations Command, the umbrella organization for all Special Forces. "Everyone knows Petraeus can't execute his strategy without the private sector." The former aide spoke on the condition that he not be identified, saying his career could be jeopardized if he went public. The International Security Assistance Force, the general's home command, did not respond to a request for comment.

The use of contractors could become a serious problem if controversies about them are not addressed, a senior British official warned during a recent visit to Washington. Pauline Neville-Jones, the U.K.'s minister of state for security and counterterrorism (and a former executive with QinetiQ PLC, a major intelligence contractor), told an audience at the Brookings Institution that "we have something of a crisis in Afghanistan" partly because of the "largely unregulated private sector security companies performing important roles" there.

The Pentagon's Central Command had nearly 225,000 contractors working in Iraq and Afghanistan and other areas at last count, doing tasks ranging from providing security to base support. Intelligence agencies such as the CIA and the National Security Agency field thousands more under classified contracts that are not publicly disclosed, but extend into every U.S. military command around the world. (According to reports in The Nation and elsewhere, Blackwater, which is now known as Xe, has contracted to send personnel into Pakistan to fight with the Joint Special Operations Command, although a command spokesman said the reports were "totally wrong.")

In response to a question from The Daily Beast, Neville-Jones said that American and British forces must work out "the operational rules and roles that they have when they are in the frontline." Unless that happens, "We are in danger of getting up against Geneva Convention problems and failure to observe fundamental rules of war."

A spokesman for SOCOM would not say exactly how many people work on its contracts, but did say that between 2001 and 2009, SOCOM's budget has grown from about $3 billion to about $10 billion. Neither SOCOM nor Special Operations forces outsource combat operations, the spokesman said. "About the only contractors Special Operations forces might have with them on operations are interpreters," he said.

However, private contractors are now fulfilling vital functions previously done by the military itself.

Blackbird is a case in point. Based in Herndon, Virginia, a stone's throw from the CIA, Blackbird deploys dozens of former CIA operatives and provides "technology solutions" to military and intelligence agencies. Much of the company's revenue—including a $450 million contract awarded last year by the Navy's Space and Naval Warfare Systems Command—comes from the deployment of special teams and equipment into enemy territory to rescue American soldiers who have been captured by Taliban or al Qaeda units or have stranded after losing their helicopters in battle.

Until recently, the task of rescuing American soldiers was largely carried out by the military's Joint Personnel Recovery Agency. But Secretary of Defense Robert Gates has recommended that the agency's parent command in Virginia be closed. If the recovery agency is shut down, Blackbird would likely pick up the rescue business as it is outsourced. In that case, recovery of captured or stranded American soldiers "won't be a military command anymore; it will be a business," said the former Special Operations command aide (an agency spokesman said, "It's too early to say what will happen.")

Blackbird is run by CEO Peggy Styer, an investor once labeled a "serial defense entrepreneur" by CNN. Last year, she hired Cofer Black, the former head of the CIA's Counterterrorism Center, to a senior position. (Black hired and managed some of the first private operatives to enter Afghanistan after the 9/11 attacks, and later joined Blackwater.) Perhaps anticipating a pickup in future business, a venture-capital fund launched by Styer and two other Blackbird founders recently raised $21 million on Wall Street. Blackbird did not return phone calls or emails.

Glevum Associates, for its part, has won contracts for controversial intelligence-gathering work.

The Boston-based company was founded in 2006 by Andrew Garfield, a former British intelligence officer with counterinsurgency experience in Northern Ireland. Garfield first gained public notice in 2004, when he was a key player in the Lincoln Group, a defense contractor that became notorious for engaging in a covert psychological operation to plant stories in the Iraqi press that put a positive spin on America and the U.S. war effort in Iraq. (Covert psychological operations are known in the trade as psy-ops.)

Garfield won his first contracts for Glevum as an adviser to the U.S. military in Iraq. Drawing on his experience in Northern Ireland, his company began researching the views of Iraqi citizens toward the U.S. military. At the time, "no one was doing systematic target audience research," he told me in an interview.

Glevum's contribution to counterinsurgency efforts is a trademarked program called "Face-to-face Research Analysis" that combines intelligence collection with polls and interviews, primarily for the Army's Human Terrain System—a system that some American social scientists have described as unethical because information gleaned from anthropological researchers ultimately can be used to kill people.

Garfield denies the charge. The U.S. military, he told me, can't "connect opinions to location." Rather, the military uses his information "to focus their operations the right way and to provide solutions that Afghans would choose." Several experts on the program said it's impossible to divorce it from other—bloodier—counterinsurgency efforts. "HTS has been an intelligence-funded program from the beginning," said John Stanton, a Virginia military analyst who has written extensively about the system.

(Glevum's corporate partners include primary contractors BAE Systems and ManTech International. K2, which declined to comment, also wins much of its classified work as a subcontractor for larger companies such as Boeing and CACI.)

Garfield pushes back against the notion that Glevum Associates bears any resemblance to Blackwater, which became synonymous with corruption and incompetence for a series of incidents that included shooting innocent civilians and smuggling illegal weapons. "Whenever people think of contractors now, they think of Blackwater," said Garfield. "Well, if you hire a cheap plumber, don't be surprised when the plumbing breaks."

Tim Shorrock is a Washington-based investigative journalist and the author of Spies for Hire: The Secret World of Intelligence Outsourcing, published in 2008 by Simon & Schuster. His articles have appeared in The Atlantic, Salon, Mother Jones, The Nation and many other publications at home and abroad. He can be reached through his website at timshorrock.com.
 

greg334

Veteran Expediter
Well Chef, I concede the info on the contractors wasn't up to date that I had but your premise of replacing soldiers as you stated seems to be somewhat not right on target. I think it is more about what the article's base is, using contractors to do a job because it doesn't inhibit the chain of command in the field.

The danger with using any Private Military Force isn't with Obama but with the congress who fund the administrations ability. It has been openly discussed that this form of mercenaries are used and with the draw down of troops in Iraq, maybe this is one issue not about the numbers but the control of the military for unilateral operations which may be a direct cause from the underlying issue of having both an immature commander in the WH and an out of control congress on a war that should not have taken shape as it did. The scariest comment that it reminds me of MacArthur/Truman issue is what was said about Petraeus ..."he wants an organization that reports directly to him,".
 

chefdennis

Veteran Expediter
Greg I said we will never totally replace OUR foot soldiers...that will never happen..but what we will see and it is slowly happening now is the increased number of contractors doing the jobs that our troops do and in larger numbers then our military...that is how barry is going to bring our troops home, but still maintain a military presents...by using ever larger numbers of contractors..as the article pointed out about iraq...and yes the comment about Petraeus is scary...but that is the direction we are headed..

I have had 3 family members that worked for military contractors return home withi the last 18 months, and each of them said the same thing...the corruption that they see each day on the part of the tribal leaders along with the payoffs from our military intelligence and the increasing numbers of contractors is by far the direction our governemnt is moving to to get our troops out...barry needs to save face with his base and this is how he will do it...money to the enemy and using military contractors to replace our troop presents...

Oh and the money that the contractors are paid is the biggest reason that our troops sign with them after their time is up....they can make in 1 yr with a contractor what they made for a minimum stit with our military (3-5 yrs)....and they are paid with tax dollars....
 

greg334

Veteran Expediter
I feel we are on the same page, I am just seeing something different but along the same lines as you.
 

Pilgrim

Veteran Expediter
Retired Expediter
Just to play the devil's advocate for a moment, one could see advantages of using private contractors to do the kind of dirty work need in a situation like Afghanistan. To begin with, their organizations are a lot smaller and secure, with better quality, already trained personnel - no Bradley Mannings; secondly, they don't have to deal with congressional mandated social experiments like females in combat and Don't Ask, Don't Tell. Under the right circumstances their operations would be a lot more efficient, especially reporting directly to Patraeus assuming he's the right person for that command. He still reports directly to the civilian authority, and can be replaced if need be.
 

chefdennis

Veteran Expediter
You are right Pilgrim! We have been using contractors for longer then most people even think, going back to WW2..The key now is them being "lawful" in how they do their work...where that was not an issue in the passed...it was all about getting the job done and nothing more....
 
Top