moose
Veteran Expediter
so the court ordered the FMCSA to address drivers harassment before mandating EOBR's.
the court order was regarding the, then active, worst offenders rule. this court order effect any future EOBR rule-making. it's even effect the now Congressional mandated EOBR rule under 'map21'.
if the feds like to see an EOBR mandate they MUST first address the court concerns regarding EOBR used to harass drivers.
in an effort to comply with the court order the FMCSA opened a docket# and collected public input.
many thousands of comments have been submitted.
the FMCSA held 3 listening sessions. MATS, Seattle, and WDC.
during those sessions thousands more comments have been filed.
clearly the FMCSA did NOT liked what we told them.
the fact is that EOBR can, are and will be used to harass drivers.
even the Truck Load association tried to come-up for the FMCSA help. in it's annual convention. the TLA had a day long forum discussing EOBR's & drivers harassment. they claimed that the use of EOBR to harass drivers is not technology driven, but a management problem that can be solved by the carrier. good quality BS!.
Clearly the FMCSA cannot satisfy the court concerns.
so despite all of the above, this week the FMCSA published this :"FMCSA to survey drivers, carriers on EOBR/driver harassment issue":
TheTrucker.com - America's Trucking Newspaper
in other words, a controlled survey can get us the answers we seek.
if we ask the right peoples the right questions, we might get the right answers !
500 drivers ? out of what, 7 million ? - surly we can find 500 drivers that are in favored of EOBR.
400 carriers ? out of what, 700,000 ? - surly we can find 400 carriers that are in favored of EOBR.
and that's how you cheat on EOBR !!!
the court order was regarding the, then active, worst offenders rule. this court order effect any future EOBR rule-making. it's even effect the now Congressional mandated EOBR rule under 'map21'.
if the feds like to see an EOBR mandate they MUST first address the court concerns regarding EOBR used to harass drivers.
in an effort to comply with the court order the FMCSA opened a docket# and collected public input.
many thousands of comments have been submitted.
the FMCSA held 3 listening sessions. MATS, Seattle, and WDC.
during those sessions thousands more comments have been filed.
clearly the FMCSA did NOT liked what we told them.
the fact is that EOBR can, are and will be used to harass drivers.
even the Truck Load association tried to come-up for the FMCSA help. in it's annual convention. the TLA had a day long forum discussing EOBR's & drivers harassment. they claimed that the use of EOBR to harass drivers is not technology driven, but a management problem that can be solved by the carrier. good quality BS!.
Clearly the FMCSA cannot satisfy the court concerns.
so despite all of the above, this week the FMCSA published this :"FMCSA to survey drivers, carriers on EOBR/driver harassment issue":
TheTrucker.com - America's Trucking Newspaper
in other words, a controlled survey can get us the answers we seek.
if we ask the right peoples the right questions, we might get the right answers !
500 drivers ? out of what, 7 million ? - surly we can find 500 drivers that are in favored of EOBR.
400 carriers ? out of what, 700,000 ? - surly we can find 400 carriers that are in favored of EOBR.
and that's how you cheat on EOBR !!!