greg334
Veteran Expediter
Former President Carter gave an interview to Der Spiegel that was posted on their site 8/15.
Now a lot of people think he was a good president, some think that he deserved the his Nobel Peace Prize, but a lot think he is an old insane man who is as unamerican as someone could get.
What gets me about his comments is this statement;
"The fundamentalists believe they have a unique relationship with God, and that they and their ideas are God's ideas and God's premises on the particular issue. Therefore, by definition since they are speaking for God anyone who disagrees with them is inherently wrong. And the next step is: Those who disagree with them are inherently inferior, and in extreme cases -- as is the case with some fundamentalists around the world -- it makes your opponents sub-humans, so that their lives are not significant. Another thing is that a fundamentalist can't bring himself or herself to negotiate with people who disagree with them because the negotiating process itself is an indication of implied equality. "
In the context of the article he is refering to Christain Fundamentalist, which includes anyone who has a strong belief in their religion but more so can and really should be applied to the Islamic terrorist.
Please read the interview and you can decide for yourself.
http://service.spiegel.de/cache/international/spiegel/0,1518,431793,00.html
Now a lot of people think he was a good president, some think that he deserved the his Nobel Peace Prize, but a lot think he is an old insane man who is as unamerican as someone could get.
What gets me about his comments is this statement;
"The fundamentalists believe they have a unique relationship with God, and that they and their ideas are God's ideas and God's premises on the particular issue. Therefore, by definition since they are speaking for God anyone who disagrees with them is inherently wrong. And the next step is: Those who disagree with them are inherently inferior, and in extreme cases -- as is the case with some fundamentalists around the world -- it makes your opponents sub-humans, so that their lives are not significant. Another thing is that a fundamentalist can't bring himself or herself to negotiate with people who disagree with them because the negotiating process itself is an indication of implied equality. "
In the context of the article he is refering to Christain Fundamentalist, which includes anyone who has a strong belief in their religion but more so can and really should be applied to the Islamic terrorist.
Please read the interview and you can decide for yourself.
http://service.spiegel.de/cache/international/spiegel/0,1518,431793,00.html