CAR GUY in LOS Angeles CA

iceroadtrucker

Veteran Expediter
Driver
From a real "Car Guy" out in Los Angeles, CA.

SO...you took FEDZILLA up on its offer of $4500. dollars to trade in your old "Clunker" (interesting choice of words)? Well, let's see who got the best of that "deal"....

If you traded in a clunker worth $3500, you got $4500 off for an apparent "savings" of $1000. You could have gotten $3,500 if you had just traded the car in. So you really are $1,000 ahead (depending on your clunker's value) at this point. Not too bad...

However, you WILL have to pay taxes on the $4500 come April 15th(something that no auto dealer will tell you). If you are in the 30% tax bracket, you will pay $1350 on that $4500.

So, rather than save $1000, you will actually pay an extra $350. to the feds. In addition, you traded in a car that was most likely paid for. Now you have 4 or 5 years of payments on a car that you did not need, trading in a "clunker" that was costing you less to run than the payments that you will now be making. Even if you save $1,000. dollars a year in gas due to better mileage, you're still gonna be in the red for five years....hello?

But wait, it gets even better: you also got ripped off by the dealer. For example, the month before the "cash for clunkers" program started, every dealer here in LA was selling the Ford Focus with all the goodies including A/C, auto transmission, power windows, etc for $12,500. because competition was stiff due to poor sales from the stalled economy.

When "cash for clunkers" came along, they stopped discounting them and instead sold them at the list price of $15,500. So, you paid $3000 more than you would have the month before. Honda, Toyota , and Kia played the same list price game that Ford and Chevy did. Now let's do the math...

You traded in a car worth: $3500

You got a discount of: $4500
---------
Net so far +$1000

But you have to pay: $1350 in taxes on the $4500
--------
Net so far: -$350 (that's minus...in the red)

And you paid: $3000 more than the car was selling for the month before
----------
Net Loss: -$3350

We could also add in the additional taxes (sales tax, state tax, dealer prep, etc.) on the extra $3000 that you paid for the car, along with the Five years of interest on the car loan; but let's just stop here while you kick yourself. Suffice it to say that those costs will be much higher than any savings you get from "better mileage".

So who actually made out on the deal? FEDZILLA collected taxes on the car along with taxes on the $4500 they "gave" you. The car dealers made an extra $3000 or more on every car they sold along with the kickbacks from the manufacturers and the loan companies. Manufacturers got to dump lots of cars they could not give away the month before. Lots of good or repairable used cars got taken off the market, crushed and sold as scrap metal to (ready for this?) CHINA! (Look it up...)And the poor consumer got saddled with even more debt that they cannot afford.

FEDZILLA'S merry men (who promised that people making less than $250,000. would pay "not one red cent more in taxes") will make millions in new tax revenues after convincing Joe Consumer that he was getting $4500 in "free" money from the "government" In fact, Joe was giving away his $3500 car and paying an additional $3350 for the privilege. Chicago politics gone global...with an agenda.

If you find errors in this math, please let me know...being a simple guy, I'm always willing to learn new things; and if you took "advantage" of the Clunkers deal, I have some swamp land down in Florida that's for sale...

 

iceroadtrucker

Veteran Expediter
Driver
Just some More of Obamanomics, Still Screwing Over the People of this Country!!


Yup and you know something reminds me of phone call when somebody forgot to hang up the phone and ran their mouth aloud.....................................................................

Really made me think. How sucked in one can get by the sweet misleadings of peoples words and tales they tell when try to get one to do something. So some one else can prevail.

When you crawl under peoples houses you here things.
Kinda funny isn't it. The net one can see all.
Don't you agree.

Have a nice day.
I have now.
 
Last edited:

greg334

Veteran Expediter
Ah yea... right.... the problem is ......

1 - you didn't get the money so you don't pay the taxes. The cash for good cars program money went from the tax payers to the feds to the dealer - not one penny went to any consumer.

2 - the deal was UP TO $4500 with some qualifications of the vehicle you were turning in. Most of them were no worth less than $4500 and most of them were not junk.

3 - dealers jacking the price of the cars up to make more money didn't really happen, they still made some sweet deals (can you say discounts?) and a lot of dealers didn't sit there and messed around with changing the retail price or removing stickers, if the people didn't like the price the people would go somewhere else and the dealer lost the sale.
 

2czykats

Seasoned Expediter
I bought a 96 Ford conversion when clunkers hadnot begun yet and pid only 4300.00 tax, tag, and title. Makes 16mpg hwy/11 city. I love it and its paid for. Seveal people told me I should trade for clunker deal and I said I could not afford new payment and buy anything else I needed so no way.

Also heard on news, Fox, that now sales are down up to 42 % since this ended and was waaaaaaaay more than auto makers thought it would be. I say duuhh...
 

greg334

Veteran Expediter
Sorry Hammy, I said "didn't really happen" because a discount is still a discount.

Honestly linking blogs doesn't count as countering my post, especially the Daily Kos, it shows a small mind when you link to them.

Reading further on, I find it idiotic that someone would think this program would help the poor. It was not about helping the poor, the poor don't deserve to buy new cars, they are poor and again shows the greed of the public at large.

Anyway another banned member from the past.
 

virginiaham

Not a Member
No reason for all of the Cackling..... and personal observations

You said "dealers jacking the price of the cars up to make more money didn't really happen"

FACT IS: you were WRONG !!!! PERIOD !!!!!
 
Top