Search results

I didn't watch the vid, [don't care for them as a source of accurate info], but I have a comment on the site itself: judging by the article on Planned Parenthood, their motto "Informing and equipping Americans Who Love Freedom" should more accurately be "Misinforming & Whipping Up Outrage Among...

So who was "held accountable" for 9-11? Compared to Benghazi, one would expect a massive cleanup of incompetent officeholders, but that didn't happen, did it? It's dragging on because the Republicans can't accept an answer they didn't want to hear, period.

I'm pretty sure that if anyone was 'investigating' the same thing for the 40th time, I'd decline to participate too. And suggest an investigation into their cognitive abilities was more likely to be useful to the citizens who pay their salaries.

Thanks AJ, [and Ragman], for the corrected address. I could see me calling Don & saying "I'm on my way" and heading for the old address on Allen Martin, lol. :o

Or you could say something intelligent, appropriate, and on topic, instead of posting drivel like this asinine intrusion into a conversation. Wait - who am I kidding?

^Point made.

There is no excuse for such ignorance - you really ought to check the actual definition of what you rant about. By your definition, if someone held a gun to your head and forced you to engage in a homosexual act against your will, you would then be a homosexual. I wouldn't say you deserve that...

Re: Are Any Expedited Carriers Concerned with keeping on Own/Op with current low rate Because: tradition! "That's the way it's always been [done]" is a tough nut to crack.

Another thing that may work in the driver's favor [or not]: if the insurance 'totals' the van and gives you a check for it, the van belongs to them, and they will examine the 'black box' to determine whether the driver's behavior caused or contributed to the accident. I don't know whether they...

On more than one occasion, I asked a Panther dispatcher whether I'd be able to use the race car they sponsored, cause that was the only way I could get it there in the time allowed, lol. Sometimes, though, I'd just point out that having landing gear on the truck does not mean it can fly. I bet...

I noticed you make pizza dough gluten free - why? :confused:

Tis - and you shot yourself with it, lol. Even if you never see someone's posts when you put them on ignore, [and I believe RLENT mentioned ways you can], and even if you don't see them quoted in replies to them by other people, the question was repeated twice by Turtle, and still not answered...

Some are also a bit confused on the "government", as it is actually "we, the people" who have changed our attitudes. Politicians understand that rejecting the will of the people is not how to get reelected, because we expect them to at least look as if they represent us. And an awful lot of 'us'...

I didn't lambaste him for ignoring someone, I merely maligned him for that. What I lambasted him for is proclaiming 'facts' he is assuming [the reason for banning], and calling his opponent a troll. What you don't seem to get about the 'ignore' thing is, you still see the 'ignored' person's...

OTOH, build up religion, and this is possible [and acceptable]

No, they would not be homosexuals. Convicts and [hetero] male prostitutes engage in homosexual sex acts for reasons other than attraction. When free to choose a partner, homosexuals are not their choice. Homosexuality is not the behavior, it's the sexual attraction to one's own gender.

I think he should be lambasted [another great word - you doing the 'new word a day' vocab thing?;)] for proclaiming the 'reason' RLENT was banned, [something he can't know, unless RLENT told him, and somehow, I'm not seeing that happening] and for repeatedly calling him a troll. He clearly...

As you are not, and never have been, a moderator/admin here, you have no knowledge of why RLENT was banned, except for 'gossip' and/or your own assumptions. If namecalling and/or personal insults are sufficient grounds, YOU should be banned, for repeatedly calling him a troll. You can add me to...

You first, lol.

This is getting tiresome already: RLENT asked the question before he was put on 'ignore'. Several times, at least 2 of which are quoted in the above posts, wherein the 2 people involved are responding to each other. The 'ignore' came after, which is what I personally find scurrilous. [Good...