Search results

Here's the Walmart page on that cooler. They don't stock that one in the store, so it's from a third party seller. Here's the Amazon page. Same thing, third party. I know someone with the Coleman 70 qt Xtreme and they use it on their boat. You don't want a lot of empty space in there, like a...

Now I regret even more not being able to attend this year. I will miss you my friend.

Here's a good rundown of the coolers in that price range, and the $400 ones. Block ice will last longer than bagged ice cubes, regardless of the cooler type, so keep that in mind. Bagged ice cubes, which is very easy to get out here, will last half as long as block ice. And obviously, the more...

Not positive about retail, but Amazon for sure carries it.

Cabella's Polar Cap and Igloo's Sportsman are each about $250 that will keep ice for 6 days. Then there's the Coleman Xtreme 70 qt at about $60 that will keep ice for 5 days.

Maybe not dancing, but you could play racketball in there. :D

In the same way that Hillary used a hammer on her cell phones, I would not be opposed to someone in the White House using a hammer on Trump's fingers every time he reached for the phone.

I agree that it is, absolutely, in the public interest to know. And just as there is no law that prohibits a presidential campaign from colluding with a Free Press to influence a US election, it is likewise in the public interest to know. Unfortunately, that same Free Press covers the two...

The Federal Anti Collusion Act of 2018 (FACA for short)

The ones calling it treason are the ones that most crack me up (and find the most disturbing). Setting aside the fact that they are embarrassingly ignorant of the law (they think an adversarial or hostile government is the same as an enemy we are actually actively at war with), they have morhped...

A) Trump Jr didn't solicit anything. He was approached by someone else. B) There was no violation of anything. Seems clear enough that the eagerness was more in the context of receiving opposition research, regardless of its origin, rather than an eagerness in obtaining information from the...

I absolutely respect your experience in this. Nevertheless, free speech, voluntarily proffered, that cannot be converted into a campaign expenditure, cannot violate campaign finance laws (without also violating the Constitution).

Picked up in Douglas heading for Tesla in Fremont, CA. Deepinahearta Silicon Valley where, oh yeah, it's way cooler. :clapping-happy:

Just the same, the first two items on your bullet list are drawn conclusions. "Improper contact" is merely a conclusion based on a question. And "violation of election laws" is a highly opinionated conclusion based on wishful thinking.

First one I've seen. I was in Tucson a couple of days and was definitely not at the one with covered parking. You saw that, huh. Ever see what happens to a green water Turtle :turtle:when left out in the desert? :cactus:It's pretty bad. :hotsprings:

By the same token, since the meeting turned out to be a big nothing burger not even remotely close to living up to its hype, and one of the top people in the campaign abandoned the meeting after a few minutes and another top official in the campaign spent the entire meeting absorbed into his...

Speaking of Walmart, here's the one in Douglas, Arizona. Covered parking for a significant portion of the lot. EYE KNOW !!! :eek:

Soooo, by "evidence" you mean opportunity to further state opinion and accusation. Got it. The entire meeting was initiated (solicited) by a British publicist (and former tabloid journalist), which as a generalized class, ranks even below a CNN journalist on the list of least credible people...

I would be a little shocked to read an FEC ruling where a "thing of value" that cannot be converted into a campaign expenditure would violate federal campaign finance laws. Especially if that "thing of value" is the voluntary provision of information (speech). Opposition research and campaign...

Well, yes and no. It depends. Those who believe Trump wasn't legitimately elected and want to give the presidency to Hillary by default judgment, because Trump and/or his campaign colluded with Russia to violate some still unstated law, this illumination of the bigger picture is all the...