Search results

Not a person in that list that could garner 2 percent of a national vote.

Might have been a noble cause after Obama won. Might be a noble cause four years from now, but just not going to happen this election cycle. Way too late.

That is likely the end result.

You had five candidates with only two having any possibility of winning. You could have ten and the same problem still exists. That won't change unless you take finances out of the picture which isn't likely to happen. Money makes 90 percent of the race. If you don't have that as a...

May come down to that sadly as there is no viable alternative. What very small alternatives are out there is basically a vote for Obama. No other way to look at what the results would come to. A vote for Gary Johnson for example would mean what?

I kinda agree on the Paul thing because of not translating a crowd into a voters. After 20 years in Congress and getting 2 out of 600 bills passed is a indication of what would happen in the future if he was to magically become president. One could talk all day long about any subject but if you...

But then there is that pesky problem of turning a crowd into voters which Paul hasn't done this time or the last time for that matter. Why Ron Paul rallies never translate into votes | Washington Times Communities He isn't really polling much differently than Gingrich. If he goes...

At this point both Paul and Gingrich are done. Paul could get some traction as a independent but won't come close to the cash or votes the others have to compete. Basically be a spoiler and nothing more.

I'm not trashing anything except maybe Obama. I think Ron Paul is spot on with several of his positions, but he is basically unelectable. Polling at 5 or 10 percent isn't going to get much done.

Stealing elections and commiting fraud? Not hardly. If that was true the democrats would be all over it with proof. Problem is, there isn't any.

It is odd that they spend all that time trashing the Republicans yet Ron Paul is still in the party. But either way, they have yet to provide a viable candidate as a alternative. It is difficult as none are anything stellar. Seems like a pointless exercise in madness to keep trashing...

Very little hiring. We have a great group of folks that thankfully make my gig pretty enjoyable.

If you hire professionals rather than just drivers, that should go away.

Well................there is that.

Typical NBC. Probably a favor for their hero Obama. Funny they didn't mention Harry Ried and he is a Mormon. On second thought, not really funny, more like predictible.

Likely vote where it will do the most good, but don't see myself throwing any cash at Romney.

Yeah...looks like it is going to be Romney for the Republicans.

Don't kid us. You saw it on Fox News first.;)

We use to have stock ......well still do but it is actually worthless. Money was taken by the government, given to the unions who in turn gave employee bonuses, gave themselves a raise, and used the rest for political purposes. Obama was quite ok with it. Shareholders must do "their fair...

Taxpayers haven't made a thing. They have repaid some money, but that is money they have already borrowed. The other money that was basically taken from the shareholders went to the unions. We are still giving them money for that goofy Volt which is a total waste of taxpayers money.