Search results

I did a google search on the article and it is listed/posted in half a dozen different places. None make mention of who the author is.

According to Obama, if it is negative news, it has to certainly be Bush's fault.

Happens all the time. Some carriers may have a TVAL, lift-gate, credentialed, all matter. They will intentionally hold that truck ( LOCK) back for coverage with a certain customer. Meanwhile they broker loads out right next to where that truck is sitting. Exclusive use in many cases (not all) is...

If you are going to be a "partner carrier" you will likely run for several carriers in order to maintain success.

Have a good one John!

When looking at the smaller unknown carriers, one almost has to look at them with expecting 80 percent of the line haul. If it is the same or lower than other carriers, then the question becomes, why take a higher risk for the same money as a known entity? At the end of the day, no company is...

Looks like they want a little more than just their Obamabucks.

Think I would wait until they have a proven track record of success. No need to gamble your money with a new carrier that may or may not produce. If you are going to do that, might be better off being the carrier.

But we can take comfort in the fact we can heat a can of soup with left over solar panels from the now defunct Solyndra.

To the OP, there may be a question about your truck with a 26 foot box. How big of a sleeper? The majority of teams are going to be looking for the 96"s. Outside of that, the good ones will migrate to the reputable established fleet owners. We currently have a waiting list. Several months from...

There is a nameless carrier in Chicago that operates under several names as well. Stories like these have a way of repeating themselves.

Ok....I'm not even sure what your talking about? If this is something that happened a long time ago I'm not seeing any reason to rehash it?

Some of that answer might depend on what part of the country you are looking.

My be a thought to ponder for those seeking that greener pasture.

Yes, "the good old days".

Total waste of money. At the conclusion of their study they will realize that they spent $500,000 to tell us that pink and lavender bandannas will make the gang members less violent.

That is just frightening.

Are you sure they are really interested in the party? I thought the gullible were more interested in Jersey Shores.:cool:

Certainly provides a good reason for term limits.

I do agree, something has to be said for the length of time he has been in Congress. I do wonder though how effective he could be because of his positions. Not that they are bad or inconsistent, but with that Congress that is currently in place, I don't see him accomplishing much. In fact, I'm...