Search results

SO, you believe that the government is ENTITLED to other's private property? What part of Marxism allows freedom? Liberalism, in the United States, WAS about freedom. Marxism is the opposite. The Marxists in this country co-opted the word "liberal" to make their swill acceptable to the...

You have led a sheltered life. George can't stand Flipper, he has no use for dead beats.

Marxists don't "get" you to pay for it, they put a gun to your head and take it! In this country they get the IRS to do that.

You never met George of the Jungle? :confused:

Why tax ANY income? Income taxes, the more progressive the worse they are, are counter productive. IF we must have an income tax, everyone should pay the same rate. I prefer a sales tax. One rate. "Penny saved is a penny earned" is anti-Marxism/socialism. The Marxist/socialist says "A penny...

No, I can't stand Delaware.

In FL. Today's load got bumped to tomorrow. Heading for TX

Mr. Sinner said that same thing in band class one day. It was funny! You would have had to been there. I hunt with a guy who's "river name" is "Babbles" This site is SO relevent!:cool:

The goal in this country IS socialism, by force of course. It cannot be put into effect any other way. ALL political extremes are bad. BOTH of our parties are. NEITHER work towards increasing freedoms, BOTH do all they can to to restrict it. Moving closer towards the ultra-conservative ideas...

It is not a "collective". Conservatism is the "Status Quo" Marxism, controls the people, kings did, dictator dis. The "Liberal" is the opposite idea. Freedom. YOUR idea of "LIBERAL" is the use of some kind of force to get what you want. It demands the loss of freedom and government control...

Sent from my SCH-I535 using EO Forums mobile app There is some fancy term for this but I don't recall what it is. That is not considered correct by many economists. They often cause much lower growth. "The short answer to this question is "No." When studying this issue, almost all economists...

OH GOODY!! :p Effectively, NO! It is not the government's money to take or lose. So not taking the money from someone, is NOT a subsidy. A subsidy is where you take the money from George of the Jungle, out of his banana fund, and give it to Flipper to buy fish.

How is a volunteer fire company socialist? :confused: It is the exact opposite. Socialism preaches that government assumes the responsibility for people, volunteers assume it for themselves. We paid for our own trucks, by selling subs and chicken corn soup. It was done by HARD WORK! We EARNED...

We too are in Orlando, not at the convention center, delivering at a private home.

I was never on the hook! :p

MORE proof that the Marxist idiots in Washington have NO clue what they are doing. They can't think past the end of their nose, OR, this was deliberate. Either way, this has the potential to cause even MORE harm, as the ACA is now famous for. Let's see just how many volunteer fire and ambulance...

Nope. Being given SOMEONE ELSE'S money is.

Waiting to do our 1PM, then, if we can make it, a 1530 pick up heading for TX

I am not aware of any church in the Detroit area that was built with tax dollars. No subsidizes there.

It's "government math", what else would you expect? These things should NEVER be built with tax dollars to start with. Why subsidize a business that produces nothing tangible and few well paying jobs? Why subsidize ANY business for that matter.