Search results

But you can take comfort in that you are doing "your fair share". Sadly, he is going to want a bigger share next year because his health plan is a train wreck and "pajama boy" isn't looking like he is going to sign many up.

You may be right. Most of what I read uses numbers ranging from the top 10 percent to the top 5 percent. Media hangs it hat on the one percent but from what I have read it is a little more than that but not much. Either way with regards to taxes, I would focus on getting rid of the waste...

I gave you the answer. The top 10 percent of wage earners. It isn't the rest of anything. According to you, the "rest of us" would include that 47 percent (often referenced in politics) as job creators. There is absolutely nothing that would indicate that.

No. Because you stated the middle class (that 52k a year) are the bulk of the current job creators. I am saying it is the top 10 percent which would also include that one percent.

I would focus on the factual issues. Much of your arguments are centered on a handful of companies ripping people off. It will make more sense when you take the emotion out of it and just study the cause and effect of the numbers.

Who would consider 399k a year as middle class? Or even 300k? According to Obama, he says you are rich if you make over 250k. Census says its 32k for a individual and 52k for a family of four. This may help. American middle class - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

They may start there, no doubt about it, but this is in reference to who is currently paying the taxes verses who may or may not in the future.

Middle class (median family income of 52K via census) is not the primary job creators. As for Amazon, seem to be holding their own pretty well. Amazon Hits 109,800 Employees, Passes Microsoft's Headcount

Ok.....take the top 10 percent of wage earners out and who is going to create, maintain or provide the jobs? I can hardly wait for your answer.

Oh my...where do I start. For one, your graph only shows the paydown number, and doesn't put that number against the total debt load which is 17.2 TRILLION and growing by the minute. A record never achieved by another president. Unemployment is still high and not much improvement. But, the...

It's possible they are looking at what some of their future workers may be like.;)

Kinda my take. In the grand scheme of things, probably jumped a little too fast.

And of course it could be another spin-off in the making. In this case, picked up by another network. All you need is a working title as you have Phil Robertson & Alec Baldwin as your leads. I believe most operate on borrowed scripts from world wrestling.:cool:

I'm not really sure what all the madness is about. This Robertson guy can say whatever he wants. If someone doesn't like it, that is probably too bad. It is HIS opinion. With that, the A&E network has every right not to have him on their channel. The aren't restricting his right to speak freely...

That would be my take. I was in favor of going after Bin Laden, but never was sold on the Iraq or Afghanistan war. I think some conservative would have been in more favor of Iraq if it was a quick campaign and we were out. Turned into something much different. As for wind and solar, we are...

Very sorry for your loss.

A rather large fact not to mention.

Raising taxes does nothing but take money from the people who have it. Which of course are the very people that create the jobs. No jobs, and you hit the poorest the hardest. Take too much, and what incentive do the rich have to create jobs? Want to fix the problem? Stop fighting winless and...

Ok...really? "The Daily Show does have the integrity that people normally ascribe to a News channel". Ummm.......no.

There sure is no way to defend this kind of stupidity.