Search results

Here is what I read, off of a CNN report: "According to firsthand accounts from soldiers in his platoon, Bergdahl, while on guard duty, shed his weapons and walked off the observation post with nothing more than a compass, a knife, water, a digital camera and a diary." IF this turns out to be...

I will get back to you on this. I read a different report, I will look for it again and post it. IF it is as you are posting, and he just walked off into the dark, on his own, in a combat zone, he got what he asked for and it was not worth the lives lost looking for him and the 5:1 made it...

Assuming the facts are as those who were there, in his unit, are saying, shoot him. That is what deserters deserve, and that is much too nice. We already paid too great a price when we lost soldiers who were out looking for him. That was far more than that deserter was worth, again, assuming it...

We are not talking about a tourist, or a college student. We are talking about a soldier, who volunteered without being forced, to accept the terms of duty. He was assigned a guard post, and walked away, putting everyone one in his unit lives in danger. Lives were lost looking for him, after he...

I have NO problem leaving a coward behind. He LEFT HIS POST, there is NOTHING more to be said.

I have NO problem disarming the police. Governments should never be armed. Governments were responsible for the deaths of hundreds of millions of people in the 20th century and there is NO sign of them stopping. Instead of making criminals out of law abiding citizens we should be locking up...

Hard to believe that there are THAT many toopid idgeeits out there. IF that is the case, we are in SERIOUS trouble. It is almost impossible to fight stupid.

IF they are THAT stupid, what are they doing in office in the first place? :confused: How can someone THAT stupid gadgeeate from college or eat?

Hey, didn't answer me! LOL!! There are really only two choices, they are absolutely stupid to believe that making criminals out of law abiding citizens will end this, OR, they are out to disarm the American people.

Working for less? How is that a win for the trucks? :confused:

Why even trade for a "person" who walked away from his guard post? :confused: Putting the lives of others in danger? Was anyone killed while out looking for him? IF he was that "upset" he SHOULD have been a man, refused the duty, and taken what ever came his way. Instead, he just left.

Have you looked at what they write? Have you even looked at the plans? Have ANY of the restrictions on law abiding citizens worked? Why are they NOT trying things that ONLY target criminals? How will doing away with part of the Bill of Rights DECREASE crime?

You believe that they WANT to stop what is going on and NOT disarm the population? IF SO, why are they ONLY trying to disarm us? :confused: After all, EVERY plan they float is aimed ONLY at law abiding citizens.

I still want to know why we have to ONLY restrict the rights and freedoms of law abiding citizens instead of those of criminals? What was wrong with tagging ID's? Can't buy a gun without one, why pay for and require FBI investigations of every law abiding citizen that wishes to own a firearm...

Re: Why we don't need liberal's ideas And how would you prove it did not?

The "New" US Capitol:

Re: Why we don't need liberal's ideas OH that one COULD be SO much fun!!!!!!!!! Don't do it Raggers! LOL!

Re: Why we don't need liberal's ideas The infringements we enjoy now are a direct result of the take over of the People by an oppressive, Marxist, government. The move to take away the right to own and carry arms started LONG before the "civil disobedience" started. There were no groups open...

Re: Why we don't need liberal's ideas

Re: Why we don't need liberal's ideas Other ways to cut back on crime. IF a person steals a gun, and is convicted of it, that person SHOULD be jailed, for a minimum of 5 years, PER STOLEN gun. IF a person uses ANY weapon during the commission of a crime, there is ANOTHER 5 years added on to the...