Search results

Also this:

Jump kick dude’s identity should have been provided. It strains credulity that he wasn’t identified all this time since there is a video of him. The same with the witness called “yellow pants”. No identification. Conveniently didn’t ID him after all this time and had video of him.

Newsmax

Apparently “Juror 54”, a woman, and is also the foreperson. Most likely dug in against acquittal and asked for jury instructions to take home with her. (To study and do research?)Probably trying to convince others that are called “followers” (passive)in jury jargon. At this point hopefully the...

Fake News is unfixable:

News report said deadlocked 6-6.

Go fund me wouldn't let him collect money for a defense either.

There is no evidence of that second from last part.

Pesky facts for some to acknowledge.

I don’t think so.

First one chased him in parking lot. The other three attacked him in the street.

Or 3 of the 4 men were felons. They identified “jump kick guy” and he also has a felony record. Conveniently for the prosecution they identified him AFTER the trial.

Prosecutors argument was RH should have gotten into a fist fight with his attackers instead. And shoot the weapon up in the air. Stupid advice because: bullets have to come back down. Also, if he loses the fight they may take his gun and shoot him with it. Or give them the opportunity to use...

Gun charge gone. When you have the lawyers and the judge debating whether the statute applies or not for hours it may indicate that the law is a bit confusing.

They don't actually believe in that.

Have you heard of Ray Epps ?

They just lap up the Fake News from CNN and others. Too stupid to know when they are being lied to.

Trump was just being diplomatic with Putin. Quit being suckered by the phony Russia narratives from Fake News.

So even if the three that were chasing and trying to subdue him by violent means thought he was an “active shooter” doesn’t negate Rittenhouse’s right to self defense. They chose to chase without knowing exactly the circumstances of the first shooting, which was self defense. They could have...

This is a ridiculous argument. So putting out fires hurt the rioter’s feeling and should be able to use deadly force against Rittenhouse without any self defense by him?