Search results

Our founding fathers knew the evils of too many laws, so they instituted limited government with only the powers enumerated in the Constitution. And when they did so, they did it via LAW, because we're a nation of laws, not of men. So, like hockey, in which an occasional fight suppresses greater...

That's been said for decades. How's that working out for you? Romney was right about the 47%. They are riding the gravy train and want nothing more than to keep it running. That leaves the Gravy Train candidate(s) with a need for only 3.1% more of the electorate to continue their plunder and...

Unfortunately, term limits have been tried in some districts but thence been thrown out a unconstitutional because the constitution lists the qualifications for holding orifice, and that you haven't previously served more than X isn't one of them. So it would take a constitutional amendment to...

As Chris Rock says, "Stabbing a guy is free."

A fine choice for you to make for yourself, though you would change your mind real quick when the scalpel started to dismember you alive. And not a decision for someone else to make for you.

Then we compel their fathers to labor or go to prison. You created it, you feed it. Tote barges & lift bales, buddy. The over-procreation would come to a screeching halt once it was no longer easy or pleasurable.

...and because it allows people to dodge responsibility for their actions. The vast majority of prenatal infantacides are done for convenience, so the parents can continue their lifestyle. You know, lots of parents of toddlers discover they don't like the lifestyle change they've experienced and...

The same is true for slavery, chattel and otherwise. But you wouldn't defend that, would you? We humans can't make something morally right or wrong; we can only discover it and conform. That abortion is wrong was always true, just as fire, electricity, and the principle of the wheel always...

But you have it backwards. It's not "take care of what you breed;" it's "only breed what you can feed." So if you're capable of raising only 1, then 1 is where you stop. Or none. Right now, we make it easy to over-breed by subsidizing children. If that stopped, if over-breeding meant that the...

We've made it easy by subsidizing irresponsibility, and what you subsidize, you get more of. We have the opportunity to do the opposite. Instead of making irresponsibility easy, we need to make it difficult and painful. The gravy train of entitlement programs must stop. In fact, it will stop...

That's coming down the pike pretty soon. Let the death panels really get cranking...

Yes, completely irrelevant to the issue.

One of the bodies involved in the woman's; the others are the baby's and the father's. If you decide to not count the father, there's still a baby involved every time. Choosing to not be gruesomely murdered gives them 100% of the say.

I'm afraid not all would agree on something that sensible. Humanism and Statism are actually religions, and prenatal infantacide and sodomy are their sacraments. They're not about to consider challenges, as you'll see from the replies.

If we get to the point where we're about to throw the switch on abolishing prenatal infantacide, then I'll sign up for one or more. We have an image of orphanages being horrible places because, for one, we allowed them to be. One reason for that is we never had the specter of tens of millions...

Nope. This one is completely justified, which is why I pointed out that I was speaking precisely.

There are more than enough couples waiting to adopt them, and if that ever changes, we can open up orphanages again. Killing "surplus" babies because you consider them "surplus" is unspeakably monstrous and evil on par with Hitler, and I don't say that flippantly. I'm speaking quite precisely...

There is a waiting list for couples desperate for a baby. And it would be a nice thing if there were charities for American orphans the way there are for foreign orphans. But, bottom line, the presence or absence of couples wanting to adopt or people wanting to donate to orphans has no bearing...

Any male that would murder an infant is no man.

Murder is already illegal. All abortion, without exception, is murder. So yes, that belief, along with other prohibitions on murder, should be imposed on the country, even if it's just one man's belief.