Search results

Rioters charged last year were able to have GoFundMe fundraisers.

Mostly all of the Left have condemned him for using self defense, which in this case was textbook. But they still want him guilty and in jail. That’s a problem. Be better. BTW, you brought up Trump and his supporters so I don’t understand your argument about bringing up the Left when it was you...

You forgot to include that he crossed state lines. The vast majority of those targeting weren’t done by MAGA, they were and still are being done by the Left. Have you heard of the NFAC?

Report that there is a verdict. About an hour from now.

Also this:

Jump kick dude’s identity should have been provided. It strains credulity that he wasn’t identified all this time since there is a video of him. The same with the witness called “yellow pants”. No identification. Conveniently didn’t ID him after all this time and had video of him.

Newsmax

Apparently “Juror 54”, a woman, and is also the foreperson. Most likely dug in against acquittal and asked for jury instructions to take home with her. (To study and do research?)Probably trying to convince others that are called “followers” (passive)in jury jargon. At this point hopefully the...

Fake News is unfixable:

News report said deadlocked 6-6.

Go fund me wouldn't let him collect money for a defense either.

There is no evidence of that second from last part.

Pesky facts for some to acknowledge.

I don’t think so.

First one chased him in parking lot. The other three attacked him in the street.

Or 3 of the 4 men were felons. They identified “jump kick guy” and he also has a felony record. Conveniently for the prosecution they identified him AFTER the trial.

Prosecutors argument was RH should have gotten into a fist fight with his attackers instead. And shoot the weapon up in the air. Stupid advice because: bullets have to come back down. Also, if he loses the fight they may take his gun and shoot him with it. Or give them the opportunity to use...

Gun charge gone. When you have the lawyers and the judge debating whether the statute applies or not for hours it may indicate that the law is a bit confusing.

They don't actually believe in that.

Have you heard of Ray Epps ?