Search results

The one’s virtue signaling and pearl clutching about hypocrisy all the time are the same that voted for Bill Clinton twice.

Does he still drink?

Buck was going to lose reelection anyway. Childish though to just take his ball and go home early. The Republican Party will be better off and be more MAGA though.

It’s like enabling an alcoholic to continue to drink shots.

Keep in there. I hear he’s doing great in the polls for reelection.

He’ll likely kick the can to them. But keeping Wade and Willis on the prosecution longer is merely enabling bad behavior and dishonesty. These dropped counts today clearly illustrates the additional pattern of dishonesty from them.

It was a Clinton appointed judge who put his thumb on the scale by ALLOWING highly prejudicial “evidence” like the Access Hollywood locker room banter and disallowing other info like her tweets and Law And Order episode that is identical to her story.

Guessed wrong.

He’s not corrupt just because someone hates him.

Along with the issue presented in the article, excessive monetary rulings in civil disputes needs to be addressed by the high court.

Your premise is wrong.

A democratic heavy jury in an area that dislikes Trump. This will likely go to the Supreme Court. https://www.newsweek.com/donald-trump-e-jean-carroll-defamation-case-award-appeal-1864764

In recapping the civil proceeding: NY changed the law which allowed EG Carroll to bypass the statute of limitations and file suit for an incident that she alleged happened almost 30 years ago. A Clinton appointed judge has the case. The civil trial is in a heavily Democratic voting area that...

The right to a speedy trial belongs to the defendant.

The “author” has a lot of stories.

Rights are important in a “democracy”.

This was illegally obtained. Fruit of the poisonous tree. https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2024/03/is-this-last-straw-raffensperger-evidence-confirms-ga/

The Colorado courts ruled based off of incomplete evidence being presented from the one-sided Committee which didn’t include exculpatory , ( and exonerating) evidence such as the testimony from the corroborating witness. The resources expended unnecessarily by having a trial in Colorado, appeal...

For those keeping score, the prosecutors that are prosecuting others for making false statements and violating their oath are actually the ones that made false statements( perjury) to the court and violated their oath. Along with witness tampering? Hoo boy! What a mess down there in Fulton...

It’s on their website. https://thefederalist.com/2024/03/07/new-book-admits-fani-willis-get-trump-investigation-began-with-illegal-recording/