Search results

Holy crap that's funny. LOL

No, of course not. But if we were going to have a one-world government, I sure wouldn't want it to be that of anyone else's. ;)

Since this is Expediters Online, and we're all expediters here, I had thought "in this business" would have implied "expediting". My bad for not being more clear. Sorry.

Aren't all times Eastern in this business (with most carriers, I mean)? Every clock I've got is set to Eastern, except the Droid which will set its own time by the towers.

I really don't have a problem with a one-world government, as long as it's ours.

Three things for sure: voided warranty, shorter engine life, damaged DPF. Shell Rotella T is a MB 228.3 oil, which is fine for the earlier models, but it the way wrong formula for the 3.0 L V6 engines. The new engines require a different formulation for lubrication of the high pressure sheer...

Of course it was. Context is everything.

I was going to write..... That won't happen until Zefram Cochrane does his thing...... but I'm positive they aren't ready for that one. :D

A joke about racism is not racist.

Federation of Planets. ;)

Whenever anyone comes back to read any new replies, it's another tick on the view count. Refreshing the page adds one, too.

I resisted changing mine for a long time, but I recently had to due to the type and volume of e-mail you can get as a moderator. In order to change it, I had to fill in all of the required fields (name, address, etc.) that up until then were blank.

Ron Paul has a history of frequenting any and every type of outlet that he can get his ideas out to people. If he hung out with the likes of Alex Jones on an exclusive basis, then a guilt by association could be reasonable inferred. But he doesn't do that. I'm not a huge, over the top Ron Paul...

No. And especially no to "anyone" in the context you attempted to pigeonhole me into right there. I said no already. Yeah, that one. People with ES call themselves independent contractors. They also tend to talk, and by reasonable inference think (whether you agree with it or not) like...

I assume you mean hypocritical (of the nature of hypocrisy) and not hypercritical (excessively or meticulously critical, or overly critical). If so, before you make (or parrot) that claim, you really should do some actual research into the earmarks which are attached to his name. You should also...

But, George Noory and Alex Jones are crackpots. Granted, that's a label, as all descriptive nouns are (including expediter, you expediter, you), but it's not a stereotype. It's an explication. (explicate - to make plain or clear).

Thank you. That's exactly right. :)

Legit, fake, I don't care. It's still hilarious. :D

In the context of what you pointed out as the example, and specifically what the example was referring to, yes.

You can't prove a negative. Don't you know that? That's one of the whopper logical fallacies where you make some outrageous accusation, and then say "the burden of proof is on you to prove me wrong." Geezus, man. I don't even know where to begin. One, none of those "facts" taken individually...