Search results

Our 'benevolent' government is at least consistent. They tax things that they do not like or want and subsidize those things that they DO like and want. They tax productive people who succeed and subsidize those who refuse to work. We KNOW what the government wants. Lazy, dependent people...

Must be slow today.

No ONE person, even Ron Paul, could save the Nation. It would take a LEADER. It would take almost a 100% change in the congress, AND, the People would have to wish it to happen. None of those things are going to happen, with or without, Ron Paul.

If Paul keeps 'improving' at this rate he will get elected when he is 102 years old. We NEED someone, with many of Paul's ideas, with FAR more experience and the FIRE and the WILL to win. That person either does not exist or does not see any chance of winning with today's Pravda.

They would do better going after Obama AND Holder on Fast and Furious. They REEK of guilt on that one. Why else would they be refusing to release all things that Congress has asked for? They MUST have something to hide.

You are right near the "Yellow Breeches" a pretty good trout stream. I used to guide on it. We are at the TA in Denver (Commerce). Delivered near here today. Have a Sat pick up in Bolder, heading for VA.

Neither do the "Gimmie Goobers" that worship him. It is SOOO easy to lead the weak. OH how that shows. Now we be OUTTA HERE!!!!

Nothing I can say in here that won't get me kicked out!!! :p

They all are.

Paul did not TRY to win. I think he was just throwing out ideas to see if they would float. They very well could have IF Paul had the 'fire in his gut' that it takes to win this. Another weak field. Makes sense for the last one in our history. It is fitting.

Which one? That bunch that they are posting is weak.

Nope, the LIBERALS that formed this Nation did NOT do it at the ballot box. It is unlikely at this point in history that those of use who believe in those ideals will be able to return it to the 'dream' that way. It seems the conservatives are returning to power. That has always been the state...

Picking up near Reno, heading for Denver. Leaving in a bit. Good week.

We shall see, very weak bunch running, none can win. The ideals of the Party don't matter if they stand no chance.

Then tell me, which idiot running should I vote, settle, for?

So my only option is to vote for someone that I do not want in that office. If that is correct would I not be doing what I always have done? Here is the list of possible candidates for the Constitution Party, (see guys, I DO look at stuff! :p) pretty weak if you ask me. Constitution Party...

NO third party is going to win. You will never find the millions you need. While I totally agree with every thing you say, it is NOT going to make a difference. Obama is going to be reanointed. It has already gone too far. We past the point of no return 40 years ago. It has just taken this...

Is not writing in who I want doing exactly that? :confused:

I have, I don't like any candidates running. If I vote for them I would be settling. If I vote for Paul I would be settling. ONLY Romney or Obama have a chance of winning and only Obama is likely to win. I could vote for the Constitution Party. If I do Obama wins. I could write in the name of a...

Nope, I am writing in a candidate. What other choice do I have?