Search results

I remember the headline I posted about the newly opened Hadron Collector. It got me in trouble. :D

That's a theory unsupported by any evidence whatsoever. It's a belief. Believing in something, no matter how strongly that belief is held, doesn't make it true. For example, I believe with all my heart and soul that you're a smart, intelligent man who's mind is open to all kinds of thoughts and...

If that's true, then you are intentionally using it incorrectly, likely to tug at some emotional thread. That's a tactic that's at the very bottom of a long list of how to convince people of your argument and that you're right. On the other hand, it's at the very top of the list of how to...

Uhm, as we've covered, the Morning After Pill ONLY prevents conception. That's all it does. Conception does not and cannot occur until the cell within the egg divides, which does not and cannot occur until the egg is implanted. You're also using the term "baby" incorrect here, in any regard. So...

It was a rhetorical question.

Anybody see a lot of Christians going into flower shops in Dearborn? Not me.

Then it would probably be better of you knew what infanticide actually meant, and used the term properly.

Here's why the emotional argument falls apart... The question you asked nearly demands a question in return, namely, who are you to sentence a fetus to death because of your views of what the future might hold for the child? What you are in effect saying,in a very emotional way is, "It's all...

False premise. And it'll be a false premise no matter how righteous and indignant you are about it.

It's unfortunate, but it happens. Yes, there are. Yes, let's not. There hasn't been a time in all of human history where children have been born into a doomed life. It's the human condition. It will always be that way. No amount of money or any other remedy has ever, nor will ever, change...

Getting out of trucking to embark on a new career by owning a gym is almost like abandoning some career to drive a truck.

Not according to the Consumer Protection Act of Washington State. You can't refuse to serve someone based on race, creed, color, sex, sexual orientation, gender identity, national origin, religion, military status, or disability. The case will hinge on whether the objection is to...

In other words, no, you're not struggling with FedEx Custom Critical. Got it. The above quoted response reminds me of computer tech support forums, where someone will post a question about fixing a problem with their Windows 7 PC, and some yahoo will invariably respond with, "Get a Mac."

If you want to murder someone, no. If you want to have an abortion, yes. The reason is, of course, murder is illegal, abortion is not. It's important that the definitions of the terms you use match the same definitions that society's lexicon at-large uses.

By the courts and Child Protective Services, which is legalized busy-bodying, yes. Of course he has rights. Significant rights, in fact. The same thing applies - they should mind their own business, unless they're the one who is pregnant, or the one who got her pregnant. The term "pro-life"...

Uh, oh. That's a setup for an ad hominem logical fallacy waiting to happen. Somebody with three degrees should know that. <snort>

Uhm, "which men THEY are" and "THAT man is THE father" are two very different contexts. One is plural and general, the other is singular and specific. One man having a say about his offspring is very, very different from a group of men wanting to have a say about offspring they have absolutely...

Words to live by, Bro, words to live by.