Search results

LOL .... well, I certainly wouldn't be happy about it, that's for sure - but in all honesty, I'd probably just laugh .... Why, you ask ? There's a funny thing that happens when authorities tend to try to suppress the free flow of information - particularly when that information involves...

Yup - maybe .... But even that may be fraught with .... difficulties .... Take a look at the history of the Espionage Act of 1917 .... and the court cases stemming from the application of it ....

That is something on which reasonable people might disagree .... Apparently, those currently in government and the military, do not see it in quite same fashion as you - since Bradley Manning has not been charged with Treason, but simply charged with the unauthorized use and disclosure of U.S...

Hmmmm .... kinda sounds like "bringing something in from another thread ....." (But I appreciate the attempt at humor ..... ;)) BTW - How's that 7 plate, continental thing workin' out for ya ?

..... they decided that The First Amendment should be first ? President John F Kennedy: Secret Society Speech (audio recording of a speech made by JFK before the American Newspaper Publishers Association, 5 minutes, 24 seconds long)

Oh yeah, absolutely .... can't trust them incompetent Nigerians .... and I'm real sure that our US investigators - who couldn't possibly have any vested interest in the outcome of the investigation of a major political figure like Cheney - will do a bang up job and doggedly track down every lead...

Link to original piece: If This Be Treason …

Here's the reason for my rather derisive comments regarding State Department Spokesman PJ Crowley's "damage control" press conference - basically it's because he, and those he works for, are lying sacks of **** - regardless of the particular political party in power at any given time: WikiLeaks...

If one is controlling the sampling, then one controls the outcome: Republican vs. Democrat women

Hmmmm .... no wonder I felt like I had heard this whole conversation somewhere before .... it was in the funnies .... :D ;)

Unfortunately, no, it isn't .... Well .... we shall see ..... read on, mon ami .... Well, that's actually quite true .... and it is an empirical fact .... unlike the seven continents thingie .... At least for this week ...... unless the IAU decides to change it's mind again ... and then it...

We all do .... :D That would be correct: it was a quote of a sentence in a Wikipedia article, which appears to have been written by a Wikipedia editor. Not exactly a correct characterization - if you believe it to be an citing of a (altered) quote from the Olympic PDF. They referenced to the...

For those wishing a fuller and more complete understanding on the number of continents that there are (or that there might be :D), you may wish to read the discussion of the subject in the following thread: Wikileaks Rides Again Long story short: .... pretty much depends on who you talk to -...

LOL .... that would seem to be a rather absolute statement ..... as though it were simply and entirely an empirical matter. That is clearly not the case - I'm afraid that things aren't quite as cut and dried as you are making them out to be. Obviously, you have chosen to agree with the 7...

Bravo LDB ! Glad to see you have confirmed what I have long suspected about your level of intellectual curiosity.

BTW, feel free to take a stab at the five continents question I posed above if you care to ....

Cute ;) Many reference materials - including big name, rather expensive, written ones - are not always accurate. It's an inherent liability of using info from another, as opposed to direct personal experience and observation. So, tell me ..... what online reference encyclopedia do you use ?

That would be your error (above) - the quote I cited is from Wikipedia, not from the Olympic PDF file - the PDF file is merely referenced in support of the statement made as part of the Wikipedia article. In the PDF it mentions the rings representing the five continents of the world, from which...

YouTube video clip of an interview that Julian Assange gave on TED TV (Technology, Entertainment, Design), 19 1/2 minutes long: Why The World Needs Wikileaks

No touch .... only pinch and squeeze ....