Search results

Actually, I think there might some delegates at stake there as well .... I don't know, but that may come into play at some point in the future ... maybe in the convention ....:rolleyes: Sure - afterall, according to the establishment and the MSM, it "doesn't really matter", right ? :rolleyes:

Glad ya liked it :D Apparently Ms. Bachmann is having trouble getting others in her camp to wantonly participate in her "Baghdad Bob" Reality Distortion Field: Ya probably won't hear this reported much on the MSM but here's where I found it: Bachmann Key Aide’s Statement on Sen. Kent...

What James Williams says: The Compassion of Dr. Ron Paul

That's true - but he hasn't thus far. Oh ... I suppose you could argue it is .... at least in a way .... I know it can be really tough, but the key for me to making sense of the world is to see/understand how things which appear similar, are often quite different. Yup - it happens .... maybe...

Excepted from Michelle Bachmann's statement on Kent Sorenson's change of political camps: "It’s clear that this was a deliberate move by the Ron Paul campaign to discredit our campaign and our growing momentum. Ron Paul is in trouble in Iowa and his campaign is worried about people learning...

Is he speaking out derogatorily towards Bachmann personally - and making self-serving uncorroborated charges that he can't substantiate ? Or has he just re-calibrated based on a political reality that is becoming more apparent as time rolls forward ? The answer to both of the above is clearly...

Good .... yeah, it wasn't pretty ..... nor was it good for the body politic in terms of our health as nation. If ya get a chance it's worth watching (IMNSHO) .... HBO Films: Hacking Democracy Irrespective of which party one concludes it reflects on (if one draws even those conclusions)...

Apparently you are totally unfamiliar with what the Iowa GOP did to Pat Buchannan in the 1996 caucuses .... :rolleyes: Have you see the HBO Documentary "Hacking Democracy" ?

Breaking: Michelle Bachmann's Iowa State Campaign Co-Chair appeared earlier at a Paul Campaign event ... and endorsed Dr. Paul: Sorenson: "When the Republican establishment is going to be coming after Ron Paul, I thought it is my duty to come to his aid." Bachmann Iowa Co-Chair Ditches...

Well, that may be true (that it's cold) ... what exactly were you expecting ? The really big problem for Dongdero, is that it happens to be true. :D And in terms of accurate observations, it certainly doesn't approach anything even close to "hysteria" .... (but the claim that it does just...

That's certainly one way of looking at it ..... however to "flip it", the contrarian view would be to ask: Since it is Congress (along with the Executive) that has managed to place us in the untenable situation we are in, and since Dr. Paul is not in the mainstream there (thankfully), and...

Here's a few words/concepts you should become familiar with: Popular Mandate Bully Pulpit

It is a signature of Ron Paul's name. But please do explain to one and all, how exactly - other than the fact that it is his name - that it appears that Dr. Paul actually signed it himself personally. Is it your premise that all signatures of someone's name must be, de facto, done by the...

What I think is that there are a lot of unhappy people out there. What I hope is that wiser heads will prevail.

Not really ..... on several counts .... the Paul campaign is actually treating the guy fairly dismissively ... and mostly just ignoring him ... Second, on the matter of keeping him around, like many people who eventually go off the deep end at some point or another, he appeared to be mostly...

Real Polatik .... Dongdero's own words and actions - over a very long period of time - speak louder than I, or anyone else, ever could. We're just pointing out Dongdero's record ... personally, I think he's a scumbag, but that's just my opinion ... anyone is free to draw a different...

Same back at ya :D No, they didn't .... because Thomas Jefferson never said those words. He did say these however: "But is the spirit of the people an infallible, a permanent reliance? Is it government? Is this the kind of protection we receive in return for the rights we give up...

New PPP poll out: Full Poll Results Here

It's all a matter of one's perspective .... from your viewpoint, it isn't .... From mine, it certainly is ..... Of course it did .... ;) Had it not been, it would have reduced the "credibility" and "believability" of the messenger .... and that's all part and parcel of camouflaging an agenda...

Perhaps so ..... (without knowing more) If one wants to address the issue of national security on a sane and rational basis, it is a necessity to address it holistically (completely) - with nothing off the table. Brutual honesty and candor is an absolute requirement. If that is the case...