Search results

Of course you didn't - but it was so obvious from your assertion of 30% to 40% that I did ... It might be said that there's two parts to marketing something: A. presenting things that appeal to an audience, and B. avoiding presenting things that repel them ...

As opposed to ignoring 60% to 70% ? It may well make sense. What form of arithmetic or mathematics do you use to draw support for that conclusion ? [/COLOR]

I wasn't aware your sensitivities were so tender ... :rolleyes:

Like I said, you apparently don't understand how wide of an audience they are trying to reach. Actually, the only place I'm seeing anything approaching hysteria is here ... by two TBN members ... who have a past history of being prone to a little "drama" ...

Actually, what is nonsensical is the "logic" of your argument. Apparently so can you ... ;)

You don't support the right of a private organization to choose who they accept advertising from or who/what they have associated with their product ? My, how very "libertarian" of you .. :rolleyes: Certainly your right. #goodluckwiththat

Then you have absolutely no understanding of who they are actually trying to market to ... Avoiding things which are potentially "controversial" would seem to indicate that they are trying to reach a very wide audience. #nobigsurprise

No, it really isn't ... because you are conflating (which is a logical fallacy): that they seek to avoid controversial and divisive subjects in pursuit of the own economic interests, in no way means that they are against something - just that they, unlike you, don't choose to be a crusader about...

Have they issued a statement to this effect ? I'm really not able to tell - since G&A apparently can't code their website so that it displays properly and doesn't get totally mangled in my browser. If so could you please link it ?

Chag Urim Sameach!

Thank you ... it is a pretty profound piece if one really thinks about it - particularly from the standpoint that the adherents of one religion have the potential to affect the nature of another religion ... either for good or for ill ... Like man himself, religion has a dualistic nature ... it...

Yes, there are ... many of them penned by folks who have no interest whatsoever in diplomatic solutions which allow for Iran's inalienable rights ... but rather seek total surrender and capitulation on the part of Iran ... Even worse - quite a few of them have regime change in Iran as their...

Ok. I am curious though ... if you feel we, as a part of the international community, shouldn't be involved in reaching an agreement with Iran with regards to them upholding their obligations under the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty, how do you see us, as a country, dealing with the issue ...

Dang ... I've used up my allocation of free articles for this month for the NYT ...

Got any more articles penned by thoroughly disgraced ***clowns ? Daily Caller Editor Faked Personas To Dig Up Dirt on Liberals | Crooks and Liars ("Gregory Davis" was a pseudonym of David Martosko - the author of the article pallud links - and was admitted to be so under sworn oath by...

I will assume that your failure to respond to the specific, substantive points I raised in response to your previous posts either indicates complete assent on your part with what I pointed out ... or complete and total capitulation and surrender, due to being unable to come up with a reasoned...

Behold what, through nationality and complicity, thou art:

Although this article was linked in the quote in my "Four Myths" post above, it really deserves it's own separate post, under the actual title of the article: No, Sanctions Did Not Prompt Iran's New Diplomacy

Not all Israelis are as hysterical as Bibi - in fact, some aren't hysterical at all: Under the radar: Israel's security establishment supports new Iran agreement #hysteriafail

For paullud, re: What the Bush Administration "did", from the article "Four Emerging Myths About the Iran, P5+1 Deal": Four Emerging Myths About the Iran, P5+1 Deal Bush Administration = ... snatching defeat from the jaws of victory ...