Search results

That was really more for the benefit of those who think the math adds up. :D

That's funny. He already has quite a history of multiple screen names and getting those banned. The user <cosetta> in this thread is a sock puppet. Cosetta is now banned, of course, as is kast, because multiple screen names aren't allowed. Ironically, kastmgmt is not banned.

Depends. All van drivers are morons, that's a given, otherwise they'd be in a straight truck. But if you call someone a moron, or an idiot, as an attack, they're equally bad.

I warned you. :D No and no. Thanks for the compliments and for the really long quote. What I wrote about FactCheck.org was true then and it remains just as true today. However, just because someone is biased doesn't mean the information they have is worthless or should be summarily dismissed out...

No, you broke the Code of Conduct when you called a member an idiot, more than once. Discussing the contents of a private message in a public forum notwithstanding, I didn't delete your posts because you can do that yourself. The only post that violated the Code of Conduct was edited to remove...

Every EO member, actually. When you violate that part of the Code of Conduct, you are disrespecting everyone here. You apologized to xiggy for calling a member an idiot, so now you've only got the 18,773 other members to apologize to. I would highly recommend one blanket apology rather than...

You will, however, be respectful of the other EO members at all times, or you will suffer the slings and arrows of your outrageous fortune for it. "To be or not to be?" That really is your question.

Unless the contract explicitly prohibits negotiation, then you can negotiate. You start off with a blank page and unlimited rights (for lack of a better word), then the contract begins restricting those rights. Not the other way around where the black page gives you no rights and then the...

We know. They're still open and operating as BH Express. (I crack myself up). I never thought you were calling me out. We're just discussin' things here. :) Having chronic pain must suck. The pain I had with the broken wrist sucked. And pain medication didn't really help much, even when I was...

Even if you get additional items and apps for the smartphone, you will have some difficulty in integrating everything (workflow, forms, fault monitoring, analytics management, HoS, VIR, performance monitoring critical event reporting, and GPS tracking among others) with an efficient dispatch...

Or, quit throwing people in jail for minor stuff.

In addition to Vehicle on the Personal Details setting page, there is a new Expediter Type where you can select among Driver, Owner/Operator and Fleet Owner. If you select one of those, it will create the appropriate banner for it under your avatar.

Of course it is. You certainly had a legitimate reason for the failure, but it was a failure nonetheless. Well, "you're a failure at..." expressly implies a current state, so in that context the answer would be no, since I am currently not failing to operate my truck. But for 6 months I failed...

BZZZZTTTT!!!! Illegal Deflection! Three to make two. :D

You will not. There is a special tool for testing them before you even install them. Once installed, the only ways to know if they're working or not is to run the engine for a few seconds and then feel up the injectors and the side of the engine by the injectors to see which ones are hot and...

Hi everyone, This forum is designed for current O/O and Contractors to discuss issues relating to this carrier, without input from other members, who tho well intentioned, are not directly involved in the issues. You do need to be added to the list of approved posters, so contact an Admin with...

Cleaned up the Black Death that covered #2 and #3 injectors and was creeping over #1 and #4. It was a mess. Replaced all 5 injector seals. One of my injectors has failed and wasn't even working. Replaced that injector plus two others that couldn't be saved when pulling them out. Replaced the...

Can you not see that in that one paragraph you state that you did not fail at running a carrier, and then proceed to explain why you failed at running a carrier?

No, you should not. You really shouldn't assume anything. You shouldn't assume I watched the entire video any more than you should assume those who made the edited videos are telling the full and unfettered unbiased truth or that I should assume you saw the link that Muttly posted to the full...

I don't know why you'd say such a <insert negative pejorative adjective here> thing. Did you not read the "objective view" part?