Search results

Me, too. I should have just given the inappropriate language Warning on the post with the picture and been done with it (something that's still being contemplated). They seemed serious.

Right. That's called intent. Unless, of course, you are claiming that when you went back and edited the post for punctuation and spacing that the letters of the word were altered by accident or my magic. My assumption is that you used an altered spelling to get a word past the filters when it...

He promised that he wouldn't talk about me and that dress. That was special, just between us.

Ahem...:giggle:

This just cracks me up.

A - It's not personal information. B - We don't need your permission. From the Code of Conduct... When you flatly state in your defense that you only edited the post for punctuation and spacing, and made NO attempt at getting around the word filters, yet there it is where you intentionally...

Puhleeze. <snort> Below shows screen caps of the History of the post, the view of the original pre-edited version, the version where you capitalized the "P" to get around the filters and lose the ****, and the original and the latest edit together. Nevertheless, when members see someone do...

Fair enough. :)

There's no need, since the list of censored words isn't all-inclusive, nor are all the words on the list necessarily inappropriate. For example, the word ":censoredsign:" is on the censored word list, mainly because it's a word that is most often used inappropriately, usually to call someone that word...

You don't see any bad language because you had to edit this post twice in order to get that word through the filters. I think it's been made clear enough in the past to everyone that if you can't type the word then you can't bypass the inappropriate language filters by posting a picture of the...

Democrats: "We're #BetterThanThis. The Republicans are all doom and gloom, divisive. They're fractured and disorganized. They're liars and untrustworthy. They are out of touch with what Americans wants. Donald Trumps only cares about Donald Trump." Karma: "Hang on..."

I just think it's hilarious that some people are outraged, and shocked, at the notion that some foreign power could be so evil as to try influence a US presidential election. Because, you know, the US would never even think of attempting of meddling in another country's politics.

Wasserman Shultz won't even speak at all now. She's toast. A Clinton campaign aide said the Russians leaked the e-mails to help Trump. Problem is, even if that's true, there's still those emails.

Red sky at night... Shepherd's delight. Blue sky at night... well that's just day.

Wow! An op-ed opinion hit piece on Donald Trump in the New York Times. There's something you don't see every day! Oh, wait. Yes, you do.

I'm still grandfathered in on the unlimited plan. I still have the Nationwide Talk 900 plan that gives me 900 Anytime minutes, for $59.99. If I ever go over the 900 minutes, it's $0.40/min. But I have the 5 most often talked-to numbers list on Friends and Family, so it's rare that I even go over...

That should read 15-40 percent.

No, not really. The Code of Conduct covers it pretty well. Freedom of speech only becomes an issue in here when someone fails to restrict their comments to within the boundaries of the COC, usually because they fail to discern the difference between, for example, "That's stupid" and "You're...

Depending on how often you encounter them, autoplay video ads will eat up between 15-40 of your bandwidth. A small video ad uses 10x-15x the bandwidth as a full screen static image.

A tracert between Chicago and India shows 11 hops with a total latency of 5300 milliseconds, so the answer is 5.3 seconds, assuming "read" is supposed to be "reach."