Search results

The one where he jokes abut dating a 10 year old girl when she's 20 years old? I think the quote will, absolutely (by the left and anti-Trump haters for sure), be put in the same contextual light of his past history and the more recent revelations, and be massaged and molded as part of a...

I am aware of that, yes. I remember when she took it over to great fanfare. The site isn't humorless in all facets, but I don't find it particularly funny when the agenda gets in the way. The tastes, and the purposeful writing. No there aren't. I read them for what they are. They are no less...

I read it occasionally. They left a bad taste in my mouth when they banned any and all positive postings about Ron Paul. They've mostly become the anti-Trump Wing of the Townhall Media blogosphere. The writing style is like Wonkette, all style and no substance, where the jokes aren't funny...

I don't know if it's really an "in-quotes" conspiracy, considering you have "well respected," "unbiased" journalists writing pieces (and making arguments on television) in defense of being biased for Hillary and against Trump, and why it's the right thing to do. I guess so. But like a lot of...

Well, yeah. The facts there are well known and not in dispute. The opinions, and the reason for the entire piece, is to further the anti-Trump bandwagon. The Fix section at the Washington Post, as well as it's editor Chris Cillizza and his sprawling staff (of 5 now, I think) certainly have their...

I'm not sure to what you are referring. If you are referring to the interview conducted via email correspondence with Trump campaign senior adviser Suzanne Ryder Jaworowski and Marko Prelevic, the managing editor of the Serbian weekly magazine Nedeljnik, I don't know if I'd characterize it as...

I dunno if you should be disturbed by it or not. It's just Blog post of someone else's opinions. One could certainly say that. Both of these candidates and their campaigns are rife with hypocrisy. It almost defies belief how much hypocrisy there is on both sides.

"Addressing" in and of itself? No, of course not. That is in part what this thread is about. But making post after post, on essentially the same subject, regardless of whether it is pro- or anti-, regardless of whether it is Trump or Hillary, is furthering an agenda.

I recall a recent exchange with CNN's Don Lemon and a guest he was interviewing. Lemon asked a question and the guest answered it. But it wasn't the answer Lemon was after. Lemon pressed several times, phrasing the question different ways, and kept getting the same type of answers. Finally, he...

No need to wait. The answer is "yes" to not being a thread to blatantly for furthering an anti-Hillary agenda, as well. This is not really a thread designed or to be used to blatantly further an agenda. Stating an opinion or taking a position, whether it is pro- or anti-, is fine. Welcomed...

Are you referring to me or to Session? If Sessions, I can't say that I blame him. He was cornered by a reporter (John McCormack) in order for the reporter to get a quote from Sessions saying that Trump was bragging about sexual assault. The same reporter asked the same question of nearly...

It is about Trump. More specifically, it's about this election cycle and the effect Trump's presence has within it. It's not really a thread designed or to be used to blatantly further an agenda, such as, for example, an anti-Trump agenda.

You won't hear many calls for his removal because the entire subject is being pushed and hammered by the SJW and the left in general in order to distract from the real actions of Hillary to get her elected. In any case... "The Weekly Standard's characterization of comments I made following...

Hillary and Trump are the two luckiest presidential candidates ever, as each is running against the only person they could possibly beat.

Probably a good move, because at the bottom of that hole you'll find hypocrisy. Political candidates offering freebie goodies in campaign ads are hardly new. Singling out Trump doing it as somehow being funny, while at the same time ignoring the other major candidate in the race, one who has...

The only load I've turned down (other than loads that wouldn't fit) was, you know those nestable pallets they use for the auto part milk crates, where they use one of the pallets for the bottom pallet, and then place another one just like it upside down on the top of the freight? They had two...

OK, fine. Let me ask you this... Why is Trump's ad LOL-worthy?

It's astonishing, isn't it? There are times, way too many of them, that Trump reminds me of Baghdad Bob. I'll never forget that one press conference where he flatly stated, "There are no Americans in Baghdad! Never!" while in the background several hundred yards away you could see the American...

It's not a deflection at all. I'm just curious as to why Trump's freebie goodies in exchange for votes are LOL-worthy, when they can't hold a candle to the Clinton freebie goodies. On the subjects of child care and paid maternity leave, for example, Clinton's is a grand slam compared to Trump's...

For a political party that wants to ram its agenda down the throat of the American people, having the presidency but not the House and Senate to go along with it is pretty much worthless. But for most Americans, the checks-and-balances envisioned by the Founding Founders facilitated by having...