Search results

Don't even tell me about not being willing to do "Grunt work" I am not a gageit of a LiBerAl college, I WORKED my way through life. They are INVADERS and SHOULD be treated as such. They have NO legal standing here and have NO right to be here. There are MILLIONS of "Americans" on welfare...

There should be NO "free" welfare. ALL funds, taken from those who earn them, given to those who did not earn them, should be REQUIRED to WORK for that money. Then again we know that the few "four letter words" that are still "frowned upon" by "Progressives" or "LiBeRaLs" are words like...

Full Definition of ABERRATION 1: the fact or an instance of deviating or being "]aberrant especially from a moral "]standard or normal state Yep, says it all

OH SHOCK OH SHOCKS! An Obama bum appointee is opposed to the Constitution! OH say it ain't so! What's new? Obama is opposed to the Constitution, Biden is, Holder is, the BATFE is, a good bunch of the SC court is. Those who believe in the Constitution are now the "enemy". Get used to it, it can...

It would seem that there are a few "evolutionists" that lack a basic understanding of how it works.

We are at the house, sorta got forced here a few days before we wanted to come home by the red geyser of anti-freeze spouting from the top of the radiator. Oh the joys.

Waiting to get loaded for run #1. Sure is WAY too dark for this time of the morning.

Sorry, I don't agree. They are due nothing. Ticking off people for the sake of doing so furthers no cause and does more harm than good. It will not solve anything, other than to further divide the nation, which is one of their primary goals. It's now bedtime. I have a early pickup and because I...

Why is it important to call it marriage, other than to tick off people for the sake of doing it? IF it was about "equality" then writing a proper civil union law would suffice. Just as a well written contract would do. It does not change the term "slightly" it alters it completely, for no real...

I am not trampling on anyone's rights. Marriage is not treated with respect by those who disrespect it, including those who want to redefine the word. I have NO problem with a legal, civil union, that affords the same "rights and privileges" as marriage, what ever those are. No one has defined...

If the wording is done right, what is the difference? Why is it important? IF it was about "Love" it matters not. There is just about nothing that cannot be done with a legal, binding, contract. It is only about money. I am not even sure that our "marriages" in THIS country are recognized in...

"WE" have trampled it? There is NO such thing as "group guilt". All transgressions are individual. I answer only for my actions, not the actions of others. I have have been married to the same woman for heading on 41 years. I trampled on nothing.

That does not answer the question I asked though. What rights and privileges are not afforded in a legal, civil union?

What "rights" do they lose by using a different word? It's ONLY about money and benefits, like most politics, wrapped up in sappy words. I don't fall for it. There is just about nothing that cannot be handled by drawing up a contract and signing it. I think that taxes have a lot to do with the...

I don't even believe that the movement to redefine the term has anything to do with "love" either. It is my belief that is all about money and benefits.

It was cut out of post #44. It can be answered by anyone who may know the answer. I don't understand what "rights and privileges" are not being afforded by legal, civil unions. I am looking for clarification.

Does it matter? I just wanted to understand that statement. I don't understand it.

"Civil unions do not always afford the same rights and privileges as marriage." What rights and privileges are not being afforded in a civil union? :confused:

It is abnormal because it does not further the survival of the species, which is the primary reason for sex. Icky has nothing to do with it. There is no need to redefine terms when a legal, civil union, would do the same thing.

Why is it that homosexuals get to redefine words? Redefining the word "gay" was not enough, now they want to redefine the word marriage. What's next?