Search results

  1. layoutshooter

    3 in a row!!

    A .500 season would be a great but steady improvement. They have a long way to come back from.
  2. layoutshooter

    3 in a row!!

    A .500 season would be a great but steady improvement. They have a long way to come back from.
  3. layoutshooter

    Bad journalism?

  4. layoutshooter

    January 2011 Location

    Re: Jan Location Good for horses and it makes great carp and catfish bait.
  5. layoutshooter

    Bad journalism?

    We have NO need for term limits. WE the People have the POWER to vote all those bums out. MANY found that out last November. All of this mess is 100% OUR fault. WE have allowed them to take away our power. WE must claim it back. VOTE ALL THE BUMS OUT!
  6. layoutshooter

    Bad journalism?

    Obama is not a "clear person" so I don't expect transparency from him. His is a career politician. That should cover it.
  7. layoutshooter

    3 in a row!!

    They have been improving all year. It is now just starting to come together. Let's hope it carries over next season. Just for a change. I am looking for a .500 season next year.
  8. layoutshooter

    Bad journalism?

  9. layoutshooter

    Bad journalism?

    Yep, I do believe that they are, so is welfare. So is the "progressive" income tax.
  10. layoutshooter

    Bad journalism?

  11. layoutshooter

    Bad journalism?

  12. layoutshooter

    Bad journalism?

  13. layoutshooter

    Bad journalism?

    Who decides who "needs" to see it? The "People" are the ultimate power in this country. The president and the congress are EMPLOYEE's of the PEOPLE. That Putz HAS to answer to his employers. Those bums in Washington have forgotten just who is in charge in this country and it ain't them!!!
  14. layoutshooter

    Bad journalism?

    The "mandate" is NOT a tax. It is a mandate with FINES. That is NOT allowed under the Constitution. Show me where the "mandate" is a tax. How is a "fine" a tax?
  15. layoutshooter

    Bad journalism?

    It does NOT have to say that they can. It has to say that they can. There is NO WHERE in the Constitution that is says that they can force a citizen to buy anything, therefor they cannot. The 10th amendment says it rather clearly. Amendment X The powers not delegated to the United States...
  16. layoutshooter

    Bad journalism?

    I have no idea. I have NO proof either way. It does seem to me that he should release that long form just to shut everybody up. Makes me wonder why he would not. Do you believe everything that he or the papers say?
  17. layoutshooter

    Bad journalism?

    You have it ALL wrong. The Constitution clearly defines the role of the Federal government. They are NOT legally allowed to go beyond that without amending the Constitution. They WILL use force to enforce the penalties. Do you really believe that they won't? I have already told my congressman...
  18. layoutshooter

    Bad journalism?

    First off, I did NOT claim that I thought he was not legal. I was speaking in general using him as an example. After all, a putz like that needs to be made an example of!! Believe an American newspaper? That IS funny!!! "Hawaii's newspaper" They have a stat run paper? That would explain a lot...
  19. layoutshooter

    Bad journalism?

    One American parent does NOT insure LEGAL citizenship and yes, IF he were NOT a LEGAL citizen, his election can and SHOULD be overturned. The law and Constitution MUST be upheld. NO ONE should be above that. Fair election? NOT IF he was not elegable to run LEGALLY.
  20. layoutshooter

    Bad journalism?

    I know what congress is to blame as well. That, however, does NOT diminish that fact that Obama is a bum.
Top