Search results

Yes, it's a little petty, and unprecedented ,for Trump to revoke security clearances for former Intel officials. It's also just as petty, and unprecedented, for former Intel officials to partisanly publicly critize the current president. You reap what you sow. I do think it would be better...

Watch the MSM fall over themselves and explode with fake outrage to defend Brennan, et al, and their security clearances. Already it's being framed as Trump punishing people for criticizing him, and of course, the "unprecedented" word gets bandied about as if that is important. Prior to 2016...

$375 may be what it's worth, if the previous owner wasn't anal about maintenance.

Yup. And within days of Trump getting the official nomination, Brennan, who was normally MIA in the press, suddenly became a fixture in the news cycle, with relentless snarks and snipes about how despicable and unqualified candidate Trump was for president. He went from quiet and invisible in...

I'm not a big fan of John Brennan, as some of you may know. He was a partisan hack before he became CIA Director, and continues to be one after leaving that position, so there's no reason to believe he suddenly became nonpartisan for 4 years as the Director under Obama. Especially since he has a...

Because suggesting to those on the right or in the middle to #Walkway from the fear and manipulation of the Leff is a little redundant. No doubt, but those not on the Left are much less likely to have succumbed to the manipulation of the lies and fear mongering of Schumer, Pelosi, Waters, the...

The post was explicitly addressed to those on the left who are afraid of this president and the future of the country under him. It was not intended to address anyone, left or right, who opposes Trump for other reasons.

#WalkAway Go check it out. For those on the left who are afraid of this president, the only question you need to ask yourself is, do you think Nancy Pelosi and Chuck Schumer are as afraid of the future under this president as they have made you feel? If the answer is no, then you need to...

They wanted Hillary to win. Bad. They knew she was going to win. And when she didn't, they were in shock, and they knew something underhanded had to have happened to cause her to lose. That was the only explanation. Russia Russia did it. And not only that, Trump colluded with Russia to do it...

Oh, my. So many responses. I'll limit it to just two... 1 - Neither did Trump. Cartoons aren't real. 2 - No, but he did bend over for him.

Remember when Obama talked about his Muslim faith and our 57 states? It happens.

That's a good question. 75% of adults in the world cannot drink milk, because they are lactose intolerant.

Editing history gets deleted after, I dunno, 6 months or a year something like that. So I can't see the edit or who did it It was probably pretty benign, whatever it was. My guess would be an edit to clean up the link to make it clickable, something like that, but you'd think that wouldn't...

I think you're probably right

This should make some people think. Hard. It's a fast going movement with liberals.

Pew is about as unbiased as you can get. They will always tell you where their sample comes from, how the survey was conducted, and what questions were asked. They rarely use loaded words that might appeal to emotion or stereotypes.

What Does "P.U." (As in Something Smelly) Stand For?

It's not hard at all to acknowledge the reseaech. I addressed it directly in my first paragraph. Which is why I didn't address that at all.

It's a poll right up there with "Boxers or Briefs?" in terms of gravity of meaning. It reminds me of that well funded and exhaustive study where they discovered that all mammals above 3kg in weight empty their bladders in around 21 seconds give or take 13 seconds. Meaning, nearly all mammals...

Good news, indeed! 41 pounds is impressive. You know what weighs 40 pounds? The average 3 year old kid.