Search results

Pffftt - yer just JEALOUS :D

Welcome, Lambie! Having driven for FECC, you already know quite a bit, and there are several threads in the archives about safety, and choosing an honest and compatible owner - it just takes time to find & read them. And if you've already teamed with a guy, you know that it's different in good...

Post #20 is a dead on illustration of the truth of this. BTW: what makes me a liberal? Is it my position on the right to bear arms [for]? Illegal immigration [against]? Please explain, I'd like to hear it.

So you are saying that Jesus made mistakes, too? And if you don't think anyone should "gather anything" [ie: form an opinion] about your posts, why bother? :confused:

TJ: perhaps, if you spend enough to insulate the bejeebers out of the van, you could get by with a much less expensive FantasticFan? I'd start there, anyway.

Absolutely agree, the driver is responsible for maintaining the vehicle - but it's the owner who is responsible for the cost, and that's where some drivers have found themselves in a tough spot. There are owners who will [as Doc Rushing said] quibble & quarrel over every dime spent, and delay...

My thought is that he would - if he had probable cause to think there was alcohol in the sleeper - just as the dog whistle provides probable cause to indicate a violation. There are specific rules about what constitutes probable cause [legally], and who may invoke it - I'm sure that those who...

I don't either, though I'd be willing to learn, provided I felt confident that the teacher is qualified - learning wrong is worse than not knowing, IMO.

But he'll get 'tranquilized' for one of them, at least.;) Sorry, Eddie - you opened the door, you knew the crowd would rush in, right? Hope it's all behind you soon....:D

I wanted to be in Ohio this weekend too, [especially to see Dabluzeman perform!] but the load I'll pick up later goes to Indy, and a 600 mile DH is just too much, sigh.:( Bet I get one to Cleveland after I deliver, lol.

The t shirts were a great idea, [one Mr Goodtude had years ago, which inspired me to make some, with "EO junkie and proud of it!" on the back, lol] and ballcaps would be good too. I'd also suggest making the bumperstickers a bit larger - they dont really stand out, unless you're looking for them...

I was finished, but you had a couple questions, and, because I would like an answer when I post questions, I answered yours. If you have no further questions.....

Statements regarding what other folks 'should of done' are the same as "I told you so", in that it serves no helpful purpose, except to make the person saying it feel smug.

You can find it on OOIDA'S website.

Hindsight is always 20/20, and telling folks what they should 'of' done is no help whatsoever - except to your own smug self image. Introducing a new scoring system is reasonable, making it retroactive is not, and I'm done with the argument.

The point is that one cannot retroactively decide to fight a ticket that didn't seem worth bothering over when it was received. I have no problem with eliminating the 'bad apples', just think it should not penalize a decision made under a different set of rules, because a different choice may...

I stayed at the Plane View in Oshkosh just a few weeks ago, and thought it was better than most.

I agree with Phil: making it retroactive is unfair. It penalizes drivers [and carriers] for decisions made under a different set of rules, without any possibility of changing them. I hope it does inspire a class action suit.