Search results

Just to touch on a couple of things. They did go back and most had every reason under the sun. But having kids was high on the womens list. Some could have been part-time jobs but some of them clearly were not. Maybe someone has to work two jobs or two part-time jobs to get something going...

I believe some have found the drug trade quite lucrative but not quite so sustaining. :eek: I do believe the opportunities are out there but people don't capitalize on them. Case in point. Seen a Stossel show outside NYC unemployment office where one after the other professed "there are no...

Yes....we all know that however based on the current rates of some carriers, they are pretending those increases don't exit. I will say, even taking wages and fuel costs out of it, regulations, higher truck prices and maintenance costs are steadily climbing.

I don't see a personal attack here. One may question your beliefs, but one must also be open to that in a public forum. You have to remember, you injected God into your responses. That is ok. But that is much different than whether someone agrees with it or not. Just calling it like I see it...

The combo of love. Religion and politics.

In todays environment you have to search for a need and create your own job/opportunity. As we say waiting on someone else might translate in to a long wait.

Don't know about vans, but California can be your friend. :cool:

That is the right answer. No more aid. It really is that simple. Oh.....and fire Hillary. What a joke. She just looks tiiiiired.

That is the value of this type of forum. If something is put up in error or isn't factual, it usually gets called on. That is a good thing in my opinion.

No...the hard reality is many prefer a socialist state. That is why the polls show what they do. You have a total failure in the White House yet you have droves defending him because he has more to give as soon as he gets it from the ones who are paying the Federal income tax.

I would want to agree until I look at what the electorate is comprised of. One could have a Chris Christie type of candidate but the minute you say you are going to cut something, all bets are off. You have now 50 percent of the population getting some kind of assistance. The message is where...

The ones not voting very well be the ones who are on the take. Again...very delicate balance.

And there lies the problem. Romney or anyone else is walking a tightrope. You just can't say the facts like you could in the Reagan era. Why? Too many on the take now. Look at the response just from his 47 percent comment. Granted it wasn't a accurate number, but that isn't the backlash. The...