Search results

You're forgetting what the Republican party used to be like. Actually, both parties, at one time, were constitutional. We don't hate the party. In fact, we love it so much, we're trying to take it back.

Not true. It's simply because we won't settle for a non-constitutionalist.

For one, so many candidates have embraced the tea party for the popularity factor. Politicians just do that kind of crap. I'm not saying the original tea party doesn't stand for liberty. I'm saying what the movement has become is all about getting rid of Obama, regardless of who is running...

I don't vote for the lesser of two evils anymore. I vote for liberty. And Obama ain't it. Neither is Romney.

Take a good long look at the Republican party. It is FILLED with wrong guys. If the right guy would show up in the Republican party, and share the news like Ron Paul does, then my guess is he wouldn't be in the party for long, and/or he'd be labelled a nut like Ron Paul is. It's so easy to quash...

Likely the same kind of people who can pronounce that a planet isn't a planet afterall.

Because, they knew if they didn't, they'd be dead in the water. But I digress... establishment Republican neo-cons and RINOs and freedom don't go together. The tea party has become, essentially, an "anybody but Obama" campaign. Liberty be dammed.

Because this isn't a democracy. Those numbers mean nothing, if the delegates choose to back him. Romney could have 100% of the vote, but not get a single delegate. "...a Republic, ma'am, if you can keep it." When will people learn that voting does not mean you're part of the process.

You know it's gotta be slow when members start wondering what happens to a drop of pee.:confused:

On the other side... when a rogue cop does his deed... that's usually one sided also.

That's the point I was getting at. However, I let you be the right wing wacko here. ;)

Read again. The FBI and ANG washed their hands of this "terrorist". But you are right on one thing, there is only one side to this. I just find it comical that, in the end, the city lawyer dropped the ball, and the judge was forced to ponder if the city should have more time or not. That was...

I was never convinced she was pure as snow. So, she was told not to come around there anymore. Was it public or private property? Was trespassing one of the charges? I didn't read that. I read "terrorism". Now is that Webster's definition of terrorism, or is it the government's definition of...

Obviously it wasn't a secure area, because even the FBI said no harm, no foul. There was a helicopter there, for tourists to take pictures of. She was pulled over by a busy-body cop. "Are you one of those right-wingers?" Damm straight, LIBTARD NAZI! I was SEETHING reading this! Who the F do...

I swear, mention it being abnormal, and you'll see the Jesse Jacksons of the gay movement come out of the woodwork. Abnormal. Men are naturally men, and women are naturally women; and they act as such (except for liberal womanized men). Men aren't supposed to prance around in see-thru-arse...

Regardless, it was an extreme power grab, from the liberty of the people to the intrusion by the government. I don't live in New York, dammit; and I sure as hell expect not to be treated as such. If New York wants a socialist government, dictating every little thing in their miserable lives...

Apparently, the judge let the case go on. I mean, you can't hold a town accountable just because one of their employees ignored the law... in this case, twice.

I hope she rapes that GD town for everything it has!

I heard a good hypothesis on the matter... Nature has a way of setting things straight, as far as population goes. When one sex of a species goes extinct, nature sometimes changes the sex of some of the remaining population. When a species is overpopulated, nature tends to change the sexual...

Kinda like the black boxes, huh?