Search results

Umm....but you know for anyone else? As for whether one is a man or woman "at the cellular level", that is where you might have a problem. It is the specific issue that blows a hole in the majority of your arguments. That is the very reason that many religions won't touch that subject.

Ok...sooo.....should a hermaphrodite walk around with a fire extinguisher?

Social security and medicare are in financial trouble. I am sure we will just borrow another trillion to bail it out. My guess is that it is in more financial trouble than they even report. The short term problem will be all these people going on medicaid. Since that is a state run program...

I don't think that agenda applies to all religious folks. But certainly some like Westboro baptist church

What some focus on is amazing. No doubt the people screaming the loudest are the ones that have probably never watch it.

I'm not sure they are the same thing whether you support either one of them. She went out of her way to make her statements directed at one person. The Robertson guy was giving his opinion in a interview in which he was asked the questions. As far as hypocrites, both parties have their fair share.

He is on here. Just posted a couple of days ago in the soapbox.

Bad idea. They want kids to sign up (pajama boy) yet these kids will just go on the parents policy. They can be on the parents policy until they are 26. No wonder they aren't buying individual policies. Duh.

It may be of benefit to reference the post or posts in question. There is some banter back and forth but I'm not sure I am looking in the right place with regards to a personal attack. If you are talking multiple threads, that would help even more. No one is pushing you away, just trying to...

But you can take comfort in that you are doing "your fair share". Sadly, he is going to want a bigger share next year because his health plan is a train wreck and "pajama boy" isn't looking like he is going to sign many up.

You may be right. Most of what I read uses numbers ranging from the top 10 percent to the top 5 percent. Media hangs it hat on the one percent but from what I have read it is a little more than that but not much. Either way with regards to taxes, I would focus on getting rid of the waste...

I gave you the answer. The top 10 percent of wage earners. It isn't the rest of anything. According to you, the "rest of us" would include that 47 percent (often referenced in politics) as job creators. There is absolutely nothing that would indicate that.

No. Because you stated the middle class (that 52k a year) are the bulk of the current job creators. I am saying it is the top 10 percent which would also include that one percent.

I would focus on the factual issues. Much of your arguments are centered on a handful of companies ripping people off. It will make more sense when you take the emotion out of it and just study the cause and effect of the numbers.

Who would consider 399k a year as middle class? Or even 300k? According to Obama, he says you are rich if you make over 250k. Census says its 32k for a individual and 52k for a family of four. This may help. American middle class - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

They may start there, no doubt about it, but this is in reference to who is currently paying the taxes verses who may or may not in the future.

Middle class (median family income of 52K via census) is not the primary job creators. As for Amazon, seem to be holding their own pretty well. Amazon Hits 109,800 Employees, Passes Microsoft's Headcount