This makes no sense. How do you determine if a person is able bodied from casual observation? Are the "Bells and Whistles" relevant?
It seems that you may be making a diagnostic conclusion that is a few steps above your pay grade.
There are many heart conditions, pulmonary disorders and pain syndromes that can limit an individuals ability to walk a long distance across parking lot yet doesn't limit their ability to sit and drive.
Here is just one example from AHA guidelines:
"Patients with cardiac disease resulting in marked limitation of physical activity. They are comfortable at rest. Less than ordinary activity causes fatigue, palpitation, dyspnea or anginal pain..."
Melissa is exactly right. An artificial leg is an assistive device that would preclude a person from being eligible for a disabled parking space; therefore, she is right not to use it.
From FL application for disabled placard:
"If the assistive device (prosthetic) significantly restores the persons ability to walk to the extent that the person can walk without severe limitation, the person is not eligible for the exemption parking permit."
She may also be guilty of mis diagnosis if her belief that only the easily observable assistive devices such as wheel chairs and oxygen define a person that "really needs
it".
This is actually easy to believe as many trucks have teams. One team member can handle the physical workload while the other may be limited to driving.
Also, with FECC you receive information disclosing situations which may involve labor ahead of time so it can be passed on. (sometimes).
I would recommend that you practice restraint before passing judgment on a stranger and giving them "a what for", whatever that is. While it is a good and noble cause to catch cheaters you may want to ease up on the trigger a bit and consider the possibility that you could be very wrong and the results could be embarrassing for all parties.