... in a feverish attempt to locate the appropriate confirmational bias.I'll have to get back to this later after I google some stuff.
... in a feverish attempt to locate the appropriate confirmational bias.I'll have to get back to this later after I google some stuff.
No? I thought everyone wanted to be a part of an historic moment. Forty years from now people who weren't old enough to vote in this election will lay claim to being a part of history. Kinda like Woodstock. It's like righteous, man.
I will be part of it. ....... I helped defeat Hillary.No? I thought everyone wanted to be a part of an historic moment.
Not by voting for him.
Don't start with me woman!Not by voting for him.
Exhibit A: CNN is an agendized News Organization>>
If there is dissension it is a rare thing and not in a harsh way.Nevertheless, you used CNN as a deflection to mitigate what Fox News does, even going as far as to claim that CNN doesn't allow dissenting opinion from their hosts (they do allow it).
Yes, that is what I think. They want to help Hillary get elected. So agenda. They will still cover news about her in a general sense, but don't spend too much time on it and not cover every angle of it in depth. They'll spend more time on Trump and his tweets than they do about her email scandal. You might think that because they spend a lot of time on Trump that it shows they are being fair to him. But a closer look will show that they'll spend time on him in mostly a negative way. They'll do stories about David Duke supporting him like its some important news item and then they'll load the panel with mostly anti Trump guests to bash him adnauseum.One article citing a unnamed source in PopSugar and GossipCop fashion is hardly worth referencing to make a point, tho. Nevertheless, his comments being politically damaging to the candidate they want to help win the election is not even close to being agendized. It's biased. Heavily biased, but it's not agendized. Unless, of course, you think their agenda is simply to help elect Hillary, then sure, it's an agenda. But their news is not agendized.
Yes you missed something. Turtle's view is that CNN's news isnt agendized. I disagree.Did I miss something in here, did anyone say that CNN didn't have an agenda? Some of us were just saying that Fox and other ones do also. I pointed out that I don't think I've heard anyone in here call out fox news for doing it. I can put videos up here all day of fox doing the same thing so I don't understand what the point is. We get it, they all do it.
BSNo? I thought everyone wanted to be a part of an historic moment. Forty years from now people who weren't old enough to vote in this election will lay claim to being a part of history. Kinda like Woodstock. It's like righteous, man.
Happy Birthday!!!I would rather not have these as my only choices... So not righteous, man.
Might be historic at any rate but not righteous.
Yes righteous! Man, I was like talking Woodstock, yaknow. I was there, so, um it was like righteous. I'm pretty sure I was there. Um maybe I just saw the movie, but it was like so real. It was righteous. Forty years from now this Hillary thing will be righteous, or maybe like totally epic.I would rather not have these as my only choices... So not righteous, man.
Might be historic at any rate but not righteous.
Lol,Yes righteous! Man, I was like talking Woodstock, yaknow. I was there, so, um it was like righteous. I'm pretty sure I was there. Um maybe I just saw the movie, but it was like so real. It was righteous. Forty years from now this Hillary thing will be righteous, or maybe like totally epic.
Anyway:
.
Thank you very much! Now I've got that dumb song stuck in my head!I'm like so mellow man.