You claim that I "constantly post wrong or incorrect claims", and the sole example you provide is that Governor Pence "repeatedly stated that it was not for discrimination"?
No, I will repeat this for you again. Your inability to follow a conversation does not mean that I then have to post everything that you say that is wrong. I'm not talking about your opinion being wrong, I mean facts. You even mention the "steady drumbeat" in this post so you are clearly aware of how many times that you have to be corrected. Start a post called things Cheri says that have to be corrected if you are really concerned.
Pence's refusal to answer the straight out question of whether the bill could be used to discriminate against gays, [every single time he was asked], added to his well known history of opposition to same sex marriage, his private signing ceremony for the bill where the invitees were well known anti gay groups and religious representatives who also support the "freedom of religion" to discriminate, [check out the photo, lol], even his statement "I am a Christian, a conservative, and a Republican - in that order." all point to the fact that his denial of intent to facilitate discrimination is a big fat lie.
That's your opinion of what the intent was which is not a fact as you just incorrectly claimed.
The incorrect and uneducated view is that Pence was just misunderstood, and "the gay agenda" is wrong to attack: IOW, your view. The correct and educated view is that Pence is a lying politician who pursues his personal agenda, then weasles when called out on it [as many people do in public forums], IOW: my view. Also, incidentally, the view of a large number of corporate CEOs, other governors & senators, and countless other educated and influential people. Including a great many many in his own political party and state.
Do you even think before you post? So corporate CEOs must be right this time even though you constantly bring up how wrong they are on their treatment of people. Then you mention corporate CEOs, other governors, and senators to bolster you being "educated" in your view. So what about the corporate CEOs, governors, senators, and countless educated and influential people that support the bill? I guess they actually mean that you are wrong if we apply the same strict standard that you use. So much for you having an educated view.
Oh: you also stated that gays are protected on a federal level, but not that the Supreme Court ruled that it doesn't apply to the states, [which is the reason for the states passing their own RFA acts]. I pointed that out in an earlier post, did you not understand it? Or do you simply ignore the facts that don't fit your views?
Wrong again. Romer v. Evans, along with the Equal Protection Clause that applies to states, and several other court cases have already set legal precedent against sexual orientation discrimination. Notice how I said before that IF they did try to discriminate that it would be crushed by a court. Do you not understand this? It's pretty basic and easy to understand.
What's ridiculous is the steady drumbeat of personal attacks because you disagree with me.
Pointing out that you are wrong is not a personal attack. You like to call people stupid or obtuse simply for not agreeing with your opinion so stop being a hypocrite.
Ditto the smear tactics, such as "You even posted a link from Think Progress, so it's clear where you get your facts from". We notice you don't [can't] refute the facts, or even address them - just dismiss the source, [because you got nothin else, lol].
I'm pointing out that you clearly get your news from biased sources, kind of like how it is pointed out that others get it from Fox News. It's clear where you get your info from and that post confirmed it. As far as refuting the "facts", that's what most of this thread has been so I'm not sure why you are having so much trouble understanding that.
Either post facts that support your contentions, or shut up, already.
I see what the issue is, you don't know what facts are. Facts are the things that I post to prove your incorrect claims wrong so that has been happening. I'm sorry that you have so much trouble following discussions and getting the correct info but if you don't want to be questioned or proven wrong then I suggest you follow the advice given in the last few words of your post.
