South Dakota ends fiscal year with balanced budget

OntarioVanMan

Retired Expediter
Owner/Operator
Pioneer Staff Report

PIERRE -- South Dakota state government ended the fiscal year on June 30 with a balanced budget and without using any state reserve funds, Gov. Mike Rounds announced today.

More than $101 million in federal stimulus money was used to help balance the $1.1 billion portion of the state budget that is funded with general tax collections, the governor said.
South Dakota lawmakers anticipated a $3.4 million deficit when the legislative session ended in March, which would have required the use of reserves to balance the budget, Rounds said. But the budget was balanced without tapping reserves because tax collections were about $2.5 million higher than earlier expectations and state agencies spent about $911,000 less than they were authorized to spend, he said.


Tax collections early in the budget year fell far below expectations, but rebounded in the final few months before June 30, the governor said. "Toward the end of the year, our revenue picture started to improve a little bit."


Jason Dilges, the governor's budget director, said spending was managed to balance the budget without a deficit or surplus. If the state ended the year with a surplus, that extra money would have had to be given to the federal government because stimulus money cannot be used to build state reserves, he said.


Rounds said spending was reduced by not filling some jobs, delaying some equipment purchases and limiting state employee travel to out-of-state meetings.

Rounds said Friday he believes the state will make it through the current year without touching its two reserve funds, which now hold more than $107 million.

Rounds said he hopes state revenues increase as the economy recovers, but he expects any recovery to be slow. He noted that South Dakota's unemployment rate has been dropping gradually, and now is at 4.5 percent, he said.
 
Last edited:

layoutshooter

Veteran Expediter
Retired Expediter
Pioneer Staff Report

PIERRE -- South Dakota state government ended the fiscal year on June 30 with a balanced budget and without using any state reserve funds, Gov. Mike Rounds announced today.

More than $101 million in federal stimulus money was used to help balance the $1.1 billion portion of the state budget that is funded with general tax collections, the governor said.
South Dakota lawmakers anticipated a $3.4 million deficit when the legislative session ended in March, which would have required the use of reserves to balance the budget, Rounds said. But the budget was balanced without tapping reserves because tax collections were about $2.5 million higher than earlier expectations and state agencies spent about $911,000 less than they were authorized to spend, he said.


Tax collections early in the budget year fell far below expectations, but rebounded in the final few months before June 30, the governor said. "Toward the end of the year, our revenue picture started to improve a little bit."


Jason Dilges, the governor's budget director, said spending was managed to balance the budget without a deficit or surplus. If the state ended the year with a surplus, that extra money would have had to be given to the federal government because stimulus money cannot be used to build state reserves, he said.


Rounds said spending was reduced by not filling some jobs, delaying some equipment purchases and limiting state employee travel to out-of-state meetings.

Rounds said Friday he believes the state will make it through the current year without touching its two reserve funds, which now hold more than $107 million.

Rounds said he hopes state revenues increase as the economy recovers, but he expects any recovery to be slow. He noted that South Dakota's unemployment rate has been dropping gradually, and now is at 4.5 percent, he said.


Michigan could learn much from South Dakota. This State is a real mess. Want to see what the Country will look like if Obama gets everything that he is after? Visit Michigan.
 

OntarioVanMan

Retired Expediter
Owner/Operator
Well..SD does have a more stable economy being ranching and farming..people have to eat no matter if working or not..

I know from My sis in law...that the legislature works hard at keeping spending in reality...no one wants more taxes..

By the way...Good Morning Joe...
 

layoutshooter

Veteran Expediter
Retired Expediter
Well..SD does have a more stable economy being ranching and farming..people have to eat no matter if working or not..

I know from My sis in law...that the legislature works hard at keeping spending in reality...no one wants more taxes..

By the way...Good Morning Joe...

Good morning to you!!

Michigan has very active farming and ag economy as well. We just have far more welfare rangers and medicade mammas to feed.

We, as a state, spend a lot of time "looking in the rear view mirror". We are just waiting for the auto industry to rebound, that will save us. We learned nothing from the crash of the auto industry in the '70's.
 

OntarioVanMan

Retired Expediter
Owner/Operator
Good morning to you!!

Michigan has very active farming and ag economy as well. We just have far more welfare rangers and medicade mammas to feed.

We, as a state, spend a lot of time "looking in the rear view mirror". We are just waiting for the auto industry to rebound, that will save us. We learned nothing from the crash of the auto industry in the '70's.

and that is the problem...in a nutshell IMO...the people of Mi in general are dreamers...they want and have no regard at what it costs, they just want....no give and take, just take, take, take,
The people of SD know this...sure we'd love big screen tv's in every classroom and every pot hole filled in right away, but that costs....problem is MI has given everything to the people and now the people expect it...this is indicative of TOO much government and the big unions are not helping at all...the auto industry will never be what is was...between the peoples attitude and state government, they'll have to scale back their expectations...
 

layoutshooter

Veteran Expediter
Retired Expediter
and that is the problem...in a nutshell IMO...the people of Mi in general are dreamers...they want and have no regard at what it costs, they just want....no give and take, just take, take, take,
The people of SD know this...sure we'd love big screen tv's in every classroom and every pot hole filled in right away, but that costs....problem is MI has given everything to the people and now the people expect it...this is indicative of TOO much government and the big unions are not helping at all...the auto industry will never be what is was...between the peoples attitude and state government, they'll have to scale back their expectations...

The problem here is that we DON'T fix the pot holes. In other words, we have NOT kept up with infrastructure maintenance. We have allowed things to get so bad that they now have to be torn up and started new.

We did not spend on schools as we should have. Too much "fluff" there, not enough on basics.

Michigan is being dragged down my 3 or 4 of our largest cities. Cities like Detroit, Saginaw and Flint. They are just huge money pits that just suck the economic life out of the State. Get rid of those cities and things would improve quickly. The best way to do that is to require people on welfare to work for that money. There would be a mass exodus from the State. That would then allow the productive people to thrive.
 

OntarioVanMan

Retired Expediter
Owner/Operator
My point about the pot hole might have been incorrect...but

How many states this year went ahead and changed/issued new "neat" looking plates? and at what cost? with taxpayer money...was that necessary? NO....
 

layoutshooter

Veteran Expediter
Retired Expediter
My point about the pot hole might have been incorrect...but

How many states this year went ahead and changed/issued new "neat" looking plates? and at what cost? with taxpayer money...was that necessary? NO....


What else do those prisoners have to do? Have to keep those poor abused drug dealers and murders busy you know. Did we issue new plates? I don't pay attention to those things.
 

layoutshooter

Veteran Expediter
Retired Expediter
you are a sad sack....*LOL*;)

Yeah, I got nuthin better to do this morning. Going over to my dad's house this afternoon for another family gathering. My nephew who lives in Ireland is in town. I always have to behave my self at these things. There will be lots of welfare rangers and medicade mammas there. Many "takers" in my family.
 

OntarioVanMan

Retired Expediter
Owner/Operator
Yeah, I got nuthin better to do this morning. Going over to my dad's house this afternoon for another family gathering. My nephew who lives in Ireland is in town. I always have to behave my self at these things. There will be lots of welfare rangers and medicade mammas there. Many "takers" in my family.

and you are going to be able to keep your mouth shut without some kind of crack? GOOD LUCK!! *LOL*
 

layoutshooter

Veteran Expediter
Retired Expediter
and you are going to be able to keep your mouth shut without some kind of crack? GOOD LUCK!! *LOL*

You would be surprised!! I will just smile and chew on my lip. I try hard not to start fights. It is NOT easy with some of that bunch I can tell you that. Dang gum Obama Bums!! Lazy no good for nuthin......................... Whew!! Glad I got that out of my system before I go over there!! Sorry useless leaches............. :eek:
 

Dakota

Veteran Expediter
My point about the pot hole might have been incorrect...but

How many states this year went ahead and changed/issued new "neat" looking plates? and at what cost? with taxpayer money...was that necessary? NO....

Indiana isn't doing too bad fiscally, but for some reason every year they send us new license plates, these new plates are like tinfoil. Why not send us good quality plates that last the life of the car, how much would they save on postage and employees having to send out all these plates. That saving would be passed on to us. I have a pile of perfectly good plates in my garage for my cars.
 

Dakota

Veteran Expediter
where would you go and live? *LOL*


couldn't help myself...*LOL*;):p

LOL nice crack OVM
Everytime I visit Detroit, I feel like I am visiting a third world country, sad very sad. Yes, Michigan has lot to offer and it is true a few large cities are dragging down the whole state.
I must hear the Pure Michigan commercials on the radio 25 times a day, they really are trying to increase their tourism.
 

Dakota

Veteran Expediter
Yeah, I got nuthin better to do this morning. Going over to my dad's house this afternoon for another family gathering. My nephew who lives in Ireland is in town. I always have to behave my self at these things. There will be lots of welfare rangers and medicade mammas there. Many "takers" in my family.

I feel for you, I have quite a few in my family too. My cousin hasn't married his girlfriend who he has been with for at least 7 years and have two kids, so that she can get welfare etc. Working the system as I call it. I got a few other lowlifes in the family too :mad: OBAMA WILL TAKE CARE OF THEM!!!
 

layoutshooter

Veteran Expediter
Retired Expediter
I feel for you, I have quite a few in my family too. My cousin hasn't married his girlfriend who he has been with for at least 7 years and have two kids, so that she can get welfare etc. Working the system as I call it. I got a few other lowlifes in the family too :mad: OBAMA WILL TAKE CARE OF THEM!!!

Yeah, we work hard to earn a living and the bums take what we earn. Great system, eh?

Tourism is BIG business here. There is a lot to see and do. Now, if we could just get rid of Detroit, Saginaw, Flint, and a couple of other places this State could be doin JUST FINE!
 
Top