Search results

Oh my, what a clever play on words and yet so naive, Macbeth. :rolleyes:

The point is, not all 45,000 troops will be coming back and entering into civilian life and the job market. Whatever the make up of these troops are, very few will be entering back into civilian lives, especially with the job market the way it is, I bet quite a few will be re-upping and...

Ummmm......do you think that when these 45,000 troops come home they are no longer in the military and will enter civilian life?????

You are contradicting yourself here layout. You say the above about Lybia and Uganda, then you say this about Iraq :confused: If you believe we should've gone into Iraq for the reasons you posted above, then you surely wouldn't disagree with Lybia or Uganda. Some major differences in the...

I was more or less looking at the fact that Iraq cost us over 4400 American live at a cost of nearly a trillion dollars. Civil War? The Lybian people were already engaged in a civil war and the region was becoming more and more destablilized, that's why we got involved in the first place...

Halleluiah!!!!!!! we agree on something. Although, that was the major reason for us to be involved. Oh, and to rid the world of an evil corrupt dictator.

So according to you this is a false report? Our troops aren't coming home? Someone better tell the Iraqi government and let the President know A.S.A.P. Oh and kudos to President Bush for setting the deadline and Obama following through and bringing our men and woman home.

Like Bush? Are you comparing Lybia to Iraq?

You should've just left it at that.

Trump who?

Finally! Welcome home troops! Link: Obama: Iraq War Over, Troops to Leave by Year's End | The Rundown News Blog | PBS NewsHour | PBS

Hillary - in raw footage - gets the news about Qaddafi: History As It Happens - The Dish | By Andrew Sullivan - The Daily Beast A readers comparison between Bush and Saddam and Obama and Qaddafi. A reader writes: Andrew Sullivan writes:

Here's a suggestion.......do away with the soapbox. Duh!

lol.....That would be Rush's point, and his objection, not mine. Exactly! You're just asking that question to the wrong guy. Exactly! Now you got it. Only problem, you're asking the wrong guy again. If Limbaugh would've put that headline on his website it would've been more...

I would love to talk about that on the thread you started, but this thread is about Rush Limbaugh saying the President is sending troops to Uganda to kill Christians! True, but are we sending 100 American troops to Uganda to kill Christians? The crux of the matter is, and the point of...

So.......do you think Obama is sending troops to Uganda to kill Christians?

Atleast we agree on that. And that's where you went wrong. Like you said, you started a thread about Obama sending troops into Uganda, go to your thread and argue with yourself. This thread is about Limbaugh saying the President was sending troops to Africa to kill Christians! Then...

You were going to run for President, and someone actually asked you to????

Yeah......kind of like your full-on frontal confrontational statement below, Skippy. Nice. No, the issue is Rush Limbaugh whining about the President sending 100 tropps to Uganda to kill Christians. Any right minded person with the smallest hint of a clue would know that the LRA is not...

Do yourself a HUGE favor and use the resources that you obvioulsy have and do some research on why and what the President is requesting. After you do that, start a thread about the decision the President has made. Getting back to the topic at hand........... What did you think of Mr...