Search results

You must be one of them tree hugging, PETA card carrying liberals.

BOOM! There it is. So you do understand how I feel about the kid standing on the dog in that manner? Finally..........

Knowing who posted the picture doesn't mean chit. You can say I'm trying to minimize it all you want and believe that but in reality that's just not what's happening here. Here's the problem turtle. You already had in your head when you did this little "experiment" that those that oppose...

Those that didn't agree with the kid standing on the dog had already saw the picture and clearly stated so. Because they mentioned the "mother" doesn't mean chit other than they already knew who posted the picture. It wasn't through any sieve what's so ever, other than they didn't approve of a...

Turtle, you want sooooo badly to prove that we (those that are opposed to letting a child to use the dog as the picture shown) have an opinion because it's political or a dislike for Palin, that you can't help yourself to do or say whatever you can to show that is why we have that opinion...

And to the question asked. If it were me, no I didn't and wouldn't allow my kids to use the dog as a step stool, let alone take the time and effort to take a snapshot of it, post it on social media and think its cute.

And somehow Ms. Palin is able to drag the President into her issues. Jesus, she's as bad as a few her in the Soapbox. It's petty and childlike comments like the one above, that people have such a disdain for this woman.

The "Common Core" remark was a joke but since you brought it up. The following video is just a short simplified explanation of Common Core. More to follow........ You can thank me later mutt's for taking the spotlight off of you for now. That is, until you decide to open your yap again.

btw.....it was your posts, particularly your numerous comments of the inability of one particular poster to comprehend, that persons ignorance being displayed, his wrong understandings and conclusions, etc, etc, that prompted my post in the first place. I couldn't agree with you more. I bet he...

I'd like to give a big thumbs up on your comment here:

No wonder EO keeps the Soapbox functional, it just keeps the "clicks" on a comin'. Because, who can't help not look at a train wreck? My lord the idiocy of some is unfathomable. EO should feel sorry for a few that just keep getting their arse's handed to them and do everyone a favor...

Oh the horror......

You need help.

B. Instruction regarding sexual purity. 1. (12) A principle for sexual purity among Christians: what is permitted is not our only guide for behavior. All things are lawful for me, but all things are not helpful. All things are lawful for me, but I will not be brought under the power...

For those that would like a better understanding of what Paul was writing about to the Corinthians, in context. It's as if Paul may just be talking directly to Mr. Robertson........ Link: http://www.enduringword.com/commentaries/4606.htm 1 Corinthians 6 - Lawsuits and Loose Living A...

I wonder who here in the soapbox that have commented on this kerfuffle actually read the GQ interview in whole? :rolleyes:

I thought it would be a good idea to put things into perspective here. Especially for those that aren't totally up on the Holy Book. You have to remember Paul's letter is written to the Chuch in Corinth, those that considered themselves believers in Christ. The abomonations that Paul...

You were much more kind in your response than I would've been. Kudo's to you for pointing out the woeful ignorance of the whole "sharia law" taking over America thingy.

Wow! I'm not sure if I should cry or laugh about that comment you just made.