Search results

  1. muttly

    Buckeyes Riot Burn Destroy Property, Not A Thug In Sight

    Do prosecutors have to present evidence that helps the defendant to grand juries? | Nolo.com
  2. muttly

    Buckeyes Riot Burn Destroy Property, Not A Thug In Sight

    You are correct. There was also two separate incidents. The one you linked to and another one which happened on Dec 26 very early in the morning. The incident with the police vehicle, reportedly ran over some rose petals that were scattered on the road. Very plausible that the officer didn't...
  3. muttly

    Buckeyes Riot Burn Destroy Property, Not A Thug In Sight

    Yes that's true, but the prosecutor did handle it in the fairest way possible. Imagine the outrage if he prevented some of the witnesses from testifying because he knew they were lying. Some would be calling it a coverup. I would like to see more Grand Juries handled the way this prosecutor...
  4. muttly

    Buckeyes Riot Burn Destroy Property, Not A Thug In Sight

    Robert McCullough did the correct thing IMO. He felt there wasn't sufficient evidence to prosecute after a thorough investigation, but still brought the case before a Grand Jury and let more eyes (Grand Jurors)look at it. They also felt there was insufficient evidence. Bob McCulloch Did the...
  5. muttly

    Buckeyes Riot Burn Destroy Property, Not A Thug In Sight

    The author is confusing news reports of riots from Ferguson and opinions from some blog and making it seem like it is the same thing. The bias article points out words like 'revelers' and 'students' are used to describe the people in the OSU incident, but downplays the reports using the word...
  6. muttly

    Buckeyes Riot Burn Destroy Property, Not A Thug In Sight

    Yep, you pulled it out of your rump orifice.
  7. muttly

    Buckeyes Riot Burn Destroy Property, Not A Thug In Sight

    No seriously, do you have the Columbus Dispatch link that says there were car fires and an overturned vehicle with this last Ohio State riot ? You said you read it from the Columbus Dispatch. You get on other people for their accuracy,reading skills, and facts. Some people would like to know...
  8. muttly

    Buckeyes Riot Burn Destroy Property, Not A Thug In Sight

    SAME results? Except by all accounts they weren't the same results. Yes they were riots, but by any measure they weren't the same.
  9. muttly

    Buckeyes Riot Burn Destroy Property, Not A Thug In Sight

    I didn't think you had any specifics. Just some cowardly contrived accusation because someone refutes your flawed premise. And that makes them a racist? Nope. Such a lazy brain you have. Race baiting wasn't ignorantly leveled. It's the truth. Leveled against someone who thinks everyone is a...
  10. muttly

    Buckeyes Riot Burn Destroy Property, Not A Thug In Sight

    Turtle said-- ' I never said the two riots yielded the same results. I noted that they did not yield the same results, actually.' The riots didn't yield the same result because there was a large disparity in the type of crime and the damage that was done.
  11. muttly

    Buckeyes Riot Burn Destroy Property, Not A Thug In Sight

    Turtle, you don't even remember what you write. You contradict yourself in the same thread and provide information that is erroneous. How is that Columbus Dispatch link about the car fires and overturned vehicle from this riot coming along?
  12. muttly

    Buckeyes Riot Burn Destroy Property, Not A Thug In Sight

    It doesn't in any way confirm it. But nice try. But in your mind everyone is racist. So that is your affliction.
  13. muttly

    Buckeyes Riot Burn Destroy Property, Not A Thug In Sight

    You drew a distinction the way the press reports riots involving mostly blacks, and riots involving mostly whites, and lamented that your list of words and phrases wouldn't be used equally with the two riots. You even referred to the Ferguson demonstrations . You erroneously used words like...
  14. muttly

    Buckeyes Riot Burn Destroy Property, Not A Thug In Sight

    Please be more specific because you are totally off the mark. You threw the word racist out there . Be prepared to back it up. 'The totality of your posts' is some lame answer . The disparate racial bias ? No Again, there are some different circumstances with regard to property damage...
  15. muttly

    Buckeyes Riot Burn Destroy Property, Not A Thug In Sight

    At West Virginia University, the tradition demands setting couches on fire [?], and how much attention does that get from the media? It's like it's ok to go nuts, if it's in the context of a game, because "feelings run high". I was responding to Cheri's post and her lamenting the lack of news...
  16. muttly

    Buckeyes Riot Burn Destroy Property, Not A Thug In Sight

    Turtle wrote-- 'Obvious differences are obvious and don't need to be pointed out. Pointing them out is in and of itself a bias when doing so is to make one group look worse than another by using different characterizations and language for doing the same activity.' It wasn't obvious to you...
  17. muttly

    Buckeyes Riot Burn Destroy Property, Not A Thug In Sight

    Turtle wrote-- 'You're better off just saying how you feel, that when blacks riot it's really, really bad, and when whites riot it ain't that big a deal, and you believe there is no bias in the press reporting of it all' Because that wouldn't be accurate to say that. You really don't have...
  18. muttly

    Buckeyes Riot Burn Destroy Property, Not A Thug In Sight

    Turtle, could you provide the Columbus Dispatch report about cars being on fire and a vehicle overturned from this Ohio State riot? Thanks
  19. muttly

    Buckeyes Riot Burn Destroy Property, Not A Thug In Sight

    Turtle wrote--'Yes, I already know you want to give one group a pass, and not the other group, and you'll find your reasons for doing so. That's how bias works.' It's not about giving one group 'a pass'. It's about objectively looking at the two incidents and pointing out the obvious...
Top