Search results

  1. muttly

    Trusting Iranians...

    Or it tells you what you don't want to hear.
  2. muttly

    Trusting Iranians...

    So It's confirmed. Ylentl stands with the liars of this Administration and the liars of Iran. Familiar company.
  3. muttly

    Trusting Iranians...

    But will Ylentl man up and admit that our administration's officials lied to us, like was illustrated in the previous article, or be in denial? .
  4. muttly

    Trusting Iranians...

    [Bold emphasis added ] After seeing the lies that were told by our administration officials in this article, it's quite telling that some like Ylentl would be for this deal.
  5. muttly

    Trusting Iranians...

    Btw, my usage of 'previously back in 2012' is correct. Although Iran stonewalled in 2011, Nothing false in the statement Ylentl. Still waiting for your answer. Honesty Isn't your strong suit though.
  6. muttly

    Trusting Iranians...

    Good grief...
  7. muttly

    Another Officer Down: No Outrage, No Riots...

    Possible the killer was worried about getting in trouble for this: From the article:
  8. muttly

    Trusting Iranians...

    Actually the answer would be yes. 2011 is previous to 2012. But thanks for playing. Article excerpt below. [bold emphasis added]
  9. muttly

    Trusting Iranians...

    No, in fact what happened was Ylentl got all bat crazy because I mentioned the 2012 stonewalling of inspectors by Iran at their site. The truth is painful for him. And he still refuses to answer that simple question . Hey Lentl, did Iran previously stonewall back in 2012? Thanks for answering...
  10. muttly

    Trusting Iranians...

    So Iran didn't previously stonewall U.N inspectors? Yes or no?
  11. muttly

    Trusting Iranians...

    I think you're a bit confused.
  12. muttly

    Trusting Iranians...

    Wow, Bill Clinton.
  13. muttly

    Trusting Iranians...

    'For example: Previously I drove for expedite company A. That statement is 100% correct, even though previously I also drove for a medical supply company.' My statement is 100% correct and accurate. Previously I drove for expedite company A. How is that not accurate and correct? Did I not drive...
  14. muttly

    Trusting Iranians...

    Stonewalling? Yes or no?
  15. muttly

    Trusting Iranians...

    That response says it all. Bill Clinton personified.
  16. muttly

    Trusting Iranians...

    [Bold emphasis added for the reading impaired]
  17. muttly

    Trusting Iranians...

    LMAO, the partisan nature of your posts and particular topics, mostly including a state in the Middle East on well documented. The lack of self awareness by you is stunning. Not qualifying. More like clarifying for the reading impaired. Stonewalling? Yes or no?
  18. muttly

    Trusting Iranians...

    That's not the context-- who have I previously driven for? I have previously driven for Expedite Company A,is my statement. Nothing false in that statement. It stands alone as 100 accurate. How you coming on that Iran stonewalling question?
  19. muttly

    Trusting Iranians...

    Nothing ignored. But no need to go bat crazy over the fact that Hot Air didn't mention the 2005 inspection as some sort of deception, or lie by omission. It was a long time ago (Inspection took place months into the previous President's second term and a decade ago. Not really relevant...
  20. muttly

    Trusting Iranians...

    Such quality people Obama relied on to get his non majority vote, eh Lentl? Convicted Fraudster Helped Obama Sell Iran Deal - Breitbart
Top