Search results

Yes, in stories that had little or nothing to do with the officer's race. There's no question that there's a double standard in the media about race relations. But the article you used an an example is not one of them. Not every story about everything that happens in Charlotte that is related...

Agree. Don't endorse anyone then. Instead they rationalize and gloss over her 'mistakes'. Such b.s... Regarding the Detroit area papers, the Detroit Free Press almost always endorses the Democrat Presidential candidate. The Detroit News almost always endorses Republican candidate.

Apparently other journalists noticed the same thing. News reporters and editors buried an important fact about the officer's race.

https://www.google.com/amp/www.foxnews.com/politics/2016/09/23/after-charlotte-shooting-press-downplays-key-fact-officers-race.amp.html?client=safari

Disagree. The fact that the officer happens to be black IS particularly newsworthy. Considering they're protesting, marching, rioting, and targeting white people in some instances because of this incident. Again, whether it's the initial story or a back story, if it involves a white officer...

I used the title 'Black officer kills black person' not as a reference to the NYT article but only to give example that it his highly unlikely you would see it as a Headline. I should have used an initial story instead of a back story. Maybe i can find one. Regarding reading highly biased...

If it was a white officer who did the shooting, the 'back story' would still have mentioned that at the beginning of the article if not in the headline: ' Second Day Of Unrest After A White Officer Kills A Black Man.' Reporters and editors know what they are doing . Burying the race of the...

Maybe they are waiting for all the facts to come out instead of joining the chorus line of those who say this is just another racial incident.

Way down in the article and after many paragraphs, the race of the officer is given.

I don't have time right now, but it's something else.

An article by the NY Times. Anyone see anything wrong on how this article is written? Man Is Shot in Charlotte as Unrest Stretches to Second Night

I also heard yesterday Erin Burnett say it in her promo of her upcoming show.

CNN edits out Clinton reference to NY explosion as 'bombing'

Dishonest and bias press. Many of them are in it to win it for Hillary. McCain caught some flack from media for calling Obama "that one" in a debate. Hillary calls him "that man" in leaked email. Crickets from many in the press.

The panel were all left depressed after Gary Johnson's 'What is Aleppo? interview. One member said it would be hypocritical to vote for him now. Her concern was 'national security'. Mika chimed in that leaves only one candidate left to vote for...Hillary Clinton. You can't make this stuff up...

And with some comic relief I give you a Slate article about The New York Times trying to correct Gary Johnson about Aleppo and getting their facts wrong twice. Hahahaha. New York Times Misidentifies Aleppo Twice in Story About Gary Johnson’s Aleppo Gaffe The New York Times article has not one...

Gary Johnson: 'What is Aleppo?' Libertarian candidate Gary Johnson: 'What is Aleppo?'

Yes, plenty of times. Use to work down there for a few years and in homes similar to those.

People from Detroit who live there now and are citizens should get that work and live in those houses.

What about the people of Detroit. Shouldn't they get first dibs on that?