Search results

Then why post the following?: I mean, obvioulsly you were thinking or wondering how Mr. Romney actually feels about the auto bailouts and asking the soapbox what they thought. See, its hard to actually come up with an opinion or thought on Mr. Romney's position without any context. Why...

Well..... I did read it and that is why I asked the question. It is a fair question to ask. You are looking for opinions, answers, thoughts, etc, etc on a snippet of information that you thought was important enough to post. I was curious if those were your own words you posted or if...

May I ask if the above statement is yours or is it from a news article, blog, website? If they are not your words, could you supply a link to where you got them so we could read it?

Exactly!!!!!

Please, do tell, what rule would that be that you think I am breaking? You are sounding quite desperate my friend. Here's the problem turtle, you are viewing it as confrontational. Look at it this way, imitation is the sincerest form of flattery. I just want to be like you.

You deleted that, really? Wow, someone needs some lotion for that thin skin.

Bank of America wouldn't even exist if it weren't for us, the taxpayer bailing them out. By the Government doing what they did, they have exposed these fees. With the transparency of these fees people can now make a decision to either live with the fees or look for other alternatives. I hope...

You disagree with the banks adding charges(fees)to its customers or you disagree with our Government setting limits on certain fees?

You threatening me? You are making it confrontational, you have no one else to blame but yourself.

{Off-topic text deleted. - Turtle}

Sure, I don't necessarily disagree with that but we have someone in here pointing out to other members that if they post something without an opininion, comment, likes or dislikes of said article posted, do you agree or disagree with the article and why or why not, it is considered to be SPAM or...

Wasn't exactly front page news, seriously? Either was the post where I got your quote from. Nice try.

What's good for the goose.............well, you know the rest.

Wow, you would think people would know you by now RLENT.

If you would've mentioned that in your opening post and taken the advice of one of your brethren, we wouldn't be having this conversation. I'll quote it again.

See your quote below. Thank you for admitting to your mistake.

No, because that's not what you meant, but if that makes you feel better, fine. Here's a good saying to live by, "Say what you mean, mean what you say." Did you not see the statement was quoted? Meaning, I am not the one who originally said it.

What charges? I simply reiterated a statement made by one of your brethren. What's with the "Dude" remark?

If you want to see what those in the Soapbox feel about a third party or making a difference in politics, all you have to do is go back and look at the the overwhelming:rolleyes: discussion when I presented this: goooh I was correct, people of the soapbox would rather sit on the sidelines...

This seems to be an appropriate question for the original poster: