Search results

I only brought up the Whitmer case to give an example about informants infiltrating into groups, organizations, and gatherings. News reports say they were there in the BLM riots in Portland last year. We know there was a heavy amount in the Whitmer case as well. It wouldn’t be a stretch to...

Ok there is progress. Lol

What are they going to do when their witness list drops to zero?

Let’s just say I don’t sheepishly get my news from NBC news and Lester Holt. Yes,it’s going forward at the moment, but looks to be teetering due to issues with the dwindling witness list, which is increasingly showing credibility problems and compromised interests.

From reports I’ve read the case is turning into a dumpster fire.

Well if grandma was waved or directed in by an officer or an informant I would think she would have a case for entrapment. More likely than not that there were informants. Since historically they have used them for stuff like this. Also, see Witmer case that is having “issues” with their...

If that is true there would be a plethora of cases where it would fall under entrapment, and information about these fellows would have to be given to Defense attorneys during discovery.

Instead they caught the big fish, like grandma :

Or this fellow: Didn’t think so. But if they turnout to be informants, there some explaining to do. Informants aren’t supposed to actually be breaking the law themselves and facilitate others to break it as well: such as ordering people to fill up the capitol, waving people in by scaffold guy...

Dude, he was herded into the building by scaffold guy with the bullhorn. What is this fellow’s name and why hasn’t he been arrested? Do you have information on this guy who he is?

What was his crime again that deserved 41 months?

What the committee is doing is a distraction. Because they’re not investigating why Ashli Babbitt was shot or about the people that facilitated the escalation of the protest/ gathering into a riot.

YOU

Well there is the guy on the scaffold yelling to people to fill up the capitol, Epps, who was doing the same, the fellow tearing down the restricted area signs and fencing so people wouldn’t know that they were in one, and oh, the other guy that either was an officer or impersonating one, who...

They’re perpetually concocting imaginary crimes.

Some seem disinterested in knowing about him and others such as scaffold bullhorn guy and restricted signs and fence guy. Instead they want to go down rabbit holes about some that legally organized a speech.

Those are just a laundry list of excuses. The individuals that were highlighted in the article, it’s very plausible to conclude that they’re being shielded from prosecution. The reason for that was also fleshed out in the article. If that is the case then many that were charged likely would have...

They want him replaced except all the alternatives are even less popular. And Biden is gushing support with independents. Dems will be the last to jump ship from his horrific job performance. Implosion pending.

Doesn’t matter. Dems are looking to broom Biden out stat and also impending doom from close to 100 seat blowout. :clapping-happy:

No, instead there is a curious selective charging process that hasn’t even charged the low hanging fruit perpetrators such as Epps, the guy removing the restricted signs and fencing so people won’t see it, and the fellow with a bullhorn on the scaffold imploring people to go into the capitol...