Dude, I can’t screenshot the entire opinion. That would be ridiculous. Just read the thing. It’s cut and dry. Precedent cases back up the decision. Voters decide the change in the constitution.
Chase and Lancaster City are the two court cases.
Also, the method of voting was by paper ballot, until “other methods” like machines began to be used. So yes, the reference to ballots was paper ballots.
Whoopdedo. I think he will be fine without them. Check him out on Rumble. I also hear that Rumble is teaming up with Trump's Truth social so it should give him an even bigger audience. It's going to be big.
:cheering-clapping-smiley-emoticon:
Not really. They’re making it harder to cheat.
Also, the dissenting opinion by the Dem judges misinterpreted the constitution’s stipulation:
“All elections by the citizens shall be by ballot or by such other method as may be prescribed by law.”
The other method could not be a paper mail-in...
I was speaking specifically about the alternate electors issue. Not the Jan6 “investigation”. (The Dems stupidly forging ahead trying to put people in jail for years for having alternate electors ready in case the courts ruled in their favor. It’s just incredibly dumb to pursue this.)
There are...
Oh I’m sure the Dems on the Pa. supreme will twist themselves into pretzels to rationalize their decision. It won’t be in following the Pa. Constitution on the matter though, because it is cut and dry: The people have to decide, not the legislature.
This has been Biden’s DOJ for over a year now. The arsonist rioter was just sentenced by the judge after the excuse filled letter was submitted by the Biden DOJ asking for a reduced sentence. Some need stop make excuses.