Search results

We have a de facto reparations in a lot of ways already. I’m asking if there is enough Dems that would approve ANY dollar amount check sent to people as reparations?

The only debate Trump should appear in would be with Tucker as the moderator. Other than that, Trump should say No to debates. https://www.revolver.news/2023/05/checkmate-fox-news-tucker-carlson-host-gop-presidential-debates/

https://www.theepochtimes.com/fox-sends-cease-and-desist-letter-to-media-matters-over-publicizing-leaked-tucker-carlson-footage_5245168.html

Is this definitively coming from Fox or someone that once worked there and leaked it to Media Matters? I notice Fox has issued a cease and desist order to MM to stop putting out Carlson videos. I would like to see him on Newsmax at 8pm. and also have some type of deal with Musk where he can have...

Are they against ANY reparations?

Fixed it: Unless you count the officer that unnecessarily panicked and shot the unarmed female protester.

Interesting tidbits :

Apparently no force is needed as well.

They were contingent electors in case they were needed. They weren’t used because the constitutional protected challenge failed. Why the Leftists are pursuing this nothing case is beyond me. Actually I know. Anything to try to get Trump. So they’ll try to do it in a deep blue area like Fulton...

Like the article said “confront” can be left to interpretation. He could be talking about his lawyers in court and wants to be present in the States while it comes to a conclusion. The case is Carroll v Trump, but his lawyers are representing him in court. It’s a nothingburger.

What purpose did Representative Jamie Raskin have by challenging the election by appearing before Congress and Vice President Biden? What authority did he have? The Electoral College Act. It’s not a story. It actually happened. It’s on tape. Except he didn’t have a Senator to sign off on it.

He gave a deposition already.

There is no secret. They challenged the election results pursuant to the Electoral College Act, similar to what Democrats did in the previous election.They were contingent Electors in case they were needed.

Everyone knows they were contingent electors except the ones playing stupid for political reasons.

Yes they do.

There shouldn’t be in any legal jeopardy in the first place. They were alternate electors in case the constitutionally protected legal challenges pursuant to the Electoral College Act were successful and needed. But again, Lawfare doesn’t care about that as well. Whatever Leftist partisan...

If someone calls a person a rapist, they’re not allowed to say it’s not true? That’s defamation? That’s where we are at in this country with this whole Dems lawfare thingy.

Whoever controls the judiciary committee has a bargaining chip.

I heard Mark Levin say this. He was chief of staff to the AG Edward Meese. He said Reagan did it and other Presidents as well. Primarily District Court judges, which there is roughly a thousand. For every two judges the opposition party gets one.