Search results

Look at the time the story gets posted.

That’s why they do it on Friday. Keep uncomfortable stuff they have to release on the down low.

It’s debatable who RFK jr takes votes from. MAGA likes him on a few issues, but won’t vote for him over Trump. He reportedly is big on “green issues” so that would take votes away from Biden.

Always on Friday. A lot of the “news” reporters leave early for the weekend. But keep spinning.

Post debate poll. He went up without even debating.

"Friday evening news dump."

You mean a Clinton judge said stuff contrary to what a jury decided that weighed the evidence with a much easier bar than a reasonable doubt.

Pesky fact. Even a heavily Democratic jury decided ( with a much lower bar of 51 percent too) that a rape didn’t occur. Repeating the lie that he is doesn’t make it so.

People were lied to about the Hunter Biden laptop, but most still voted for Biden regardless of his criminal actions and decades long record of deceit.

They see that he is being politically targeted through lawfare. That’s why he’s way up in the polls. People see that. Even ads aren’t working against him.

Some hopelessly ignorant and gaslit by MSNBC.

How do you spin a quarter of a million dollars wired to Joe Biden’s house from a Chinese foreign national?

From the article posted: Also this:

It can’t be meaningless if it’s actually relevant, but at least you were to admit that the statement referred to Trump, something the court didn’t want to do. That doesn’t provide confidence for the defense that the court will be an honest and fair arbiter in the judicial process.

Then the ONE PERSON stated by the court previously was referencing Trump, right?

What defies belief is the statement that it wasn’t in reference to Trump, which it OBVIOUSLY WAS. Again, here it is: “Its the defense, not the court…” If the court is willing to be dishonest about this, what other deceptions can the defense expect?

“Defies belief”