Search results

I've heard him comment on it,but will try to find exactly what he said and post it soon.

Your comments are accurate. Ron Paul saw the futility of running as a third party candidate so he chose the republican party because at least there is some common ground. Ron Paul is a man with principles,but how does alligning himself with a party that he obviously has contempt for square with...

Ron Paul himself thinks a third party is a waste of time so theres that.

Say what you want about McCain's lack of leadership positions and experience and RINO tendencies,but he trumps Obama in life experience and service to his country by a wide margin. He would have been a much better president than what we got now.

Just curious,but do you have any examples to share?

So using your criteria just stated are you prepared to call Obama a moron? Yes or no.

cmon now practice what you preach and respect your elders.

Really lame that you call Bachmann a moron. Totally unfounded.

Oh the horror.:rolleyes:

Thanks for proving my point.

Here is the thing. I like Ron Paul. I see a problem though when many of his followers claim that he and only he has the correct views and everyone else running is a complete moron. See how far that gets you.

Hannity doesn't dislike Ron Paul. Like he said he agrees with him most of the time except mostly on foreign policy issues. I don't see the rabid hostility from Hannity towards Paul that you claim I just think your seeing something that just isn't there.. It's interesting that you seem to try to...

An excellent six minute interview and you pick out a minor disagreement about a scheduling matter as indisputable proof that Ron Paul is once again being mistreated by the media. Oh the humanity.:rolleyes:

Alrighty then.:D

Bill Maher

Doing construction in a high rise in Detroit.

Well it's a continuous battle to make the republican party more conservative. No reason to just give up because it's too hard. The attempt at marginalizing of conservatives takes place from the dems and the lamestream media more than anything. I could be wrong,but looked up who controlled...

Republicans no better than the Dems? Maybe,Maybe not but the repubs have some true conservatives that are at least attempting to change their party.The Dems don't have any. Small point but the Repubs controlled congress for only half of Bush's term not 6yrs. Getting back to the thread topic...

Sorry Clinton wasn't to right of Bush economically. He would have spent like Obama if not for the republican congress takeover in 1994. Rush became popular in the late 1980's when a republican was president.(the first Bush) sustained it thru Clinton,then Bush 2, then Obama. He has withstood the...

Yet Bush and Hannity have flourished whether it was a republican or a democrat in the whitehouse so I doubt that would happen.